Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40520298›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Utilization of personal protective equipment and its key factors among WA oil factory workers in Debre Markos town, Ethiopia.

Abraham Teym, Tirsit Ketsela Zeleke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abraham TeymDepartment of Environmental Health, College of Health Sciences, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.
Tirsit Ketsela ZelekeDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Edible oil manufacturing is a labor-intensive sector with significant technological demands, where employees face various occupational hazards. The use of personal protective equipment (PPE) is not only a legal obligation but also a key measure for safeguarding workers against job-related injuries and health risks. Despite these challenges, this industry often remains under-researched and overlooked. Objective: To assess utilization of personal protective equipment and its key factors among workers in the WA edible oil factory in Debre Markos town, Ethiopia, in 2024. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among employees of the WA Edible Oil Factory in Debre Markos. Using a simple random sampling method, 387 workers were selected to participate. Data were collected through an interviewer-administered structured questionnaire, focusing on the use of protective equipment, as well as socio-demographic, work-related, environmental, and organizational characteristics. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 26. Logistic regression analysis was employed to identify factors influencing the use of protective equipment, with the strength of associations expressed as odds ratios at a 95% confidence level. Results: Out of the total workforce, 214 individuals (55.3%) reported using personal protective equipment while on duty. The study identified several significant factors influencing personal protective equipment utilization, including receiving safety training, having access to protective equipment, regular occupational health and safety inspections, the presence of workplace safety protocols, having three or more years of work experience, and abstaining from alcohol consumption and smoking. Conclusion: The utilization level of personal protective equipment among workers at the WA edible oil factory was found to be moderate when compared to findings from other developing countries. Key factors influencing personal protective equipment usage included access to safety training, availability of protective gear, workplace supervision, the presence of safety protocols, work experience, and lifestyle behaviors such as alcohol and tobacco use. To improve personal protective equipment utilization, it is recommended to strengthen workplace supervision, offer comprehensive safety training, and ensure the consistent availability of safety guidelines.

Indexed as

Occupational HealthPersonal Protective EquipmentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultedible oil factoryEthiopiafactory workerpersonal protective equipmentutilization

Identifiers

PMID40520298
PMCPMC12162996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.