Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40520288›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Delayed access to innovative medicines in Romania: a comprehensive analysis of the reimbursement processes (2015-2024).

Constantin Radu, Diana Elena Serban, Nona Delia Chiriac

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Constantin RaduNovartis Pharma Services, Bucharest, Romania.
Diana Elena SerbanNovartis Pharma Services, Bucharest, Romania.
Nona Delia ChiriacNovartis Pharma Services, Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Romania's reimbursement framework for innovative medicines relies on health technology assessments (HTAs) resulting in unconditional or conditional decisions. Although conditional decisions aim to manage financial uncertainty via Cost-Volume (CV) agreements, anecdotal evidence points to growing delays and a growing backlog of indications waiting to be reimbursed. This study is the first to systematically quantify these delays and assess their evolution over time. Methods: We analyzed all publicly available full HTA reports (2015-2024) from Romania's National Drug Agency. Each indication was classified by HTA decision (unconditional, conditional, or negative) and reimbursement status. Descriptive analyses included mean and median durations for HTA and reimbursement processes. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis compared time-to-reimbursement between conditional and unconditional indications. Finally, we fit a simple linear model (2022-2024) to project future backlog growth under current policies. Results: Out of 613 full HTA reports covering 666 indications, 44% were conditionally approved, 42% unconditionally, and 14% received a negative decision; oncology accounted for ~40% of all indications. The HTA process (submission to decision) improved considerably, with mean durations nearly halving from 208 days in 2020 to roughly 100 days in 2024. Despite these improvements, the mean time from HTA decision to reimbursement rose from 222 days in 2020 to 461 days in 2024 overall, with conditional decisions taking on average 274 more days than unconditional ones in 2024. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that by 24 months post-HTA decision, 98.3% of unconditional indications were reimbursed, compared to only 60.1% of conditional indications. Meanwhile, the backlog of unreimbursed indications increased from 47 in 2022 to 146 in 2024, and linear projections suggest it could reach 247 by 2026 under the current system. Discussion: Despite some efficiency gains in the HTA evaluation stage, Romania's conditional reimbursement pathway remains hampered by tight budgets and administrative hurdles, prolonging patient inaccessibility-particularly in oncology, where timely treatment is critical. Strengthening administrative capacity, diversifying Managed Entry Agreement (MEA) models, and integrating new digital tools could help address these bottlenecks. Without substantial reforms, the backlog will continue growing, limiting patients' timely access to innovative therapies.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityReimbursement MechanismsTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalHumansRomaniaconditional reimbursementdelaysdrug reimbursementhealth technology assessmentmanaged entry agreementsRomania

Identifiers

PMID40520288
PMCPMC12162988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.