ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Delayed access to innovative medicines in Romania: a comprehensive analysis of the reimbursement processes (2015-2024).
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- When More Is Not Always Better: Linear and Nonlinear Predictors of Maternal Wellbeing During Pregnancy.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Structural drivers of drug shortages and market withdrawal: a longitudinal analysis of the Romanian pharmaceutical market.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- From Legislative Harmonization to Real-World Access: A Scoping Review of Pharmaceutical Regulation and Access to Medicines in Romania.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A Comparative Study of Clinical and Demographic Profiles of Multiple Sclerosis Patients in Two Regional Centers in Denmark and Romania.Neurology international · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive Review of the Latest Approaches to Managing Hypercholesterolemia: A Comparative Analysis of Conventional and Novel Treatments: Part II.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Delayed access to innovative medicines in Romania: a comprehensive analysis of the reimbursement processes (2015-2024).Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Romania's reimbursement framework for innovative medicines relies on health technology assessments (HTAs) resulting in unconditional or conditional decisions. Although conditional decisions aim to manage financial uncertainty via Cost-Volume (CV) agreements, anecdotal evidence points to growing delays and a growing backlog of indications waiting to be reimbursed. This study is the first to systematically quantify these delays and assess their evolution over time. Methods: We analyzed all publicly available full HTA reports (2015-2024) from Romania's National Drug Agency. Each indication was classified by HTA decision (unconditional, conditional, or negative) and reimbursement status. Descriptive analyses included mean and median durations for HTA and reimbursement processes. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis compared time-to-reimbursement between conditional and unconditional indications. Finally, we fit a simple linear model (2022-2024) to project future backlog growth under current policies. Results: Out of 613 full HTA reports covering 666 indications, 44% were conditionally approved, 42% unconditionally, and 14% received a negative decision; oncology accounted for ~40% of all indications. The HTA process (submission to decision) improved considerably, with mean durations nearly halving from 208 days in 2020 to roughly 100 days in 2024. Despite these improvements, the mean time from HTA decision to reimbursement rose from 222 days in 2020 to 461 days in 2024 overall, with conditional decisions taking on average 274 more days than unconditional ones in 2024. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that by 24 months post-HTA decision, 98.3% of unconditional indications were reimbursed, compared to only 60.1% of conditional indications. Meanwhile, the backlog of unreimbursed indications increased from 47 in 2022 to 146 in 2024, and linear projections suggest it could reach 247 by 2026 under the current system. Discussion: Despite some efficiency gains in the HTA evaluation stage, Romania's conditional reimbursement pathway remains hampered by tight budgets and administrative hurdles, prolonging patient inaccessibility-particularly in oncology, where timely treatment is critical. Strengthening administrative capacity, diversifying Managed Entry Agreement (MEA) models, and integrating new digital tools could help address these bottlenecks. Without substantial reforms, the backlog will continue growing, limiting patients' timely access to innovative therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.