ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2025
Multi-omics analysis of flavor differences in pectoral muscles between Wuqin 10 duck and Cherry valley duck.
Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrated flavoromics and lipidomics analysis of metabolic difference and flavor regulation mechanisms in duck subcutaneous adipose tissue.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to explore the impact of breeds on the lipid composition and flavor substances in duck pectoral muscles. In this study, 63-day-old Wuqin 10 ducks (WQ) and Cherry Valley ducks (CV) were selected as the research objects. The pectoral muscle tissues were collected. The composition of volatile flavor substances in pectoral muscles was detected by using headspace solid-phase microextraction combined with comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry. The lipid composition of pectoral muscles was determined by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, and the differentially expressed genes in duck pectoral muscles were determined by a high-throughput sequencer. Through integrated analysis, the main substances and main genes that affect the flavor of ducks were identified. The results showed that the detection results of flavor substances indicated that eight differential volatile compounds were screened out in the comparison between WQ ducks and CV ducks, namely, 4(1H)-Pyridinone, 2, 3-dihydro-1-methyl-, 1-Octen-3-ol, Hexanoic acid, trans-4-tert-butylcycloheptanol, 1-Octanol, 2, 4-Decadienal, (E, E)-, N, N'-Diacetylethylenediamine, Pyrimidine, 4-butyl-3, 4-dihydro-5-methyl-. The differential volatile compounds were mainly manifested in hydrocarbons, aldehydes and ketones, esters. A total of 86 differential lipids were screened out in the comparison between WQ ducks and CV ducks. Among them, the lipid differences between WQ and CV ducks were mainly in triglycerides (TG), phosphatidylcholines (PC) and glycerophospholipids (PE). A total of 500 differentially expressed genes were screened out in the comparison between WQ ducks and CV ducks. These differentially expressed genes were mainly involved in pathways such as glycerolipid metabolism, fatty acid degradation, and regulation of lipolysis in adipocytes. In summary, this study screened and determined that eight volatile organic compounds were the key aroma substances in the pectoral muscles of the two groups of ducks, and 86 differential lipids could distinguish the pectoral muscles of the two groups of ducks. Triglycerides (TG), phosphatidylcholines (PC) and glycerophospholipids (PE) played a crucial role in the formation of volatile compounds in pectoral muscles. The differentially expressed genes
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.