Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40520243›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X2025

Blood pressure in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy and adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton pregnancies: A bidirectional cohort study.

Liangkun Ma, Yini Li, Xuanjin Yang, Ye Li, Suhan Zhang, Mingyue Hu, Yin Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Liangkun MaNational Clinical Research Centre for Obstetric and Gynaecologic Diseases, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Dongcheng, Beijing, China.
Yini LiNational Clinical Research Centre for Obstetric and Gynaecologic Diseases, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Dongcheng, Beijing, China.
Xuanjin YangNational Clinical Research Centre for Obstetric and Gynaecologic Diseases, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Dongcheng, Beijing, China.
Ye LiNational Clinical Research Centre for Obstetric and Gynaecologic Diseases, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Dongcheng, Beijing, China.
Suhan ZhangNational Clinical Research Centre for Obstetric and Gynaecologic Diseases, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Dongcheng, Beijing, China.
Mingyue HuNational Clinical Research Centre for Obstetric and Gynaecologic Diseases, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Dongcheng, Beijing, China.
Yin SunNational Clinical Research Centre for Obstetric and Gynaecologic Diseases, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Dongcheng, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although blood pressure in singleton pregnancies is related to multiple adverse pregnancy outcomes, the blood pressure threshold has been controversial. Objective: To explore the blood pressure reference threshold of singleton pregnant women in the second and third trimesters. Study design: A bidirectional single-centre cohort study was undertaken. Clinical data were collected for women with singleton pregnancies who underwent regular antenatal examinations and delivered at Peking Union Medical College Hospital between July 2020 and June 2023. Blood pressure was recorded at 20-24 and 28-32 weeks of gestation, and hypertension and pre-eclampsia were used as the primary outcomes. The percentiles of blood pressure were calculated, and the 95th percentile was used as the upper limit for the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Poisson regression was used to calculated adjusted relative risk (aRR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were used to analyse the relationship between elevated blood pressure and adverse pregnancy outcomes, and to further explore the impact of changes in blood pressure in the second and third trimesters on pregnancy outcomes. Results: In total, 7854 pregnant women with singleton pregnancies were included in this study. For pregnant women who did not experience adverse outcomes related to blood pressure, the 95th percentiles of systolic and diastolic blood pressure in the second trimester were 131 mmHg and 80 mmHg, respectively. Corresponding data for the third trimester were 130 mmHg and 80 mmHg, respectively. Therefore, 130/80 mmHg was taken as the upper limit of blood pressure. After excluding confounding factors, regardless of trimester, the risks of gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, preterm birth, low birth weight and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission were found to be significantly higher in pregnant women with elevated blood pressure ( Conclusion: The blood pressure threshold of singleton pregnant women in the second and third trimesters is 130/80 mmHg. Sustained elevated blood pressure is harmful to the health of mothers and infants. Management and monitoring should be strengthened for pregnant women with elevated blood pressure.

Indexed as

Adverse pregnancy outcomeBidirectional cohort researchBlood pressureSingleton pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID40520243
PMCPMC12166734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.