ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Analyzing collaboration dynamics in new drug R&D: A case study of two lipid-lowering drugs.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The advancements in biotechnology have ushered in a new age for drug development, characterized by increased collaborative efforts. Academic institutions, pharmaceutical firms, hospitals, foundations, and various other entities across different sectors are now joining forces more frequently to accelerate new drug innovation. However, there remains a limited understanding of how scientific and technological advancements are influencing these research collaborations. Methods: In this study, the development of two types of lipid-lowering drugs served as case studies. A detailed network analysis was performed at the levels of authors, institutions, and countries to quantify the evolutionary trends in research collaboration. Results: In the clinical research segment of the academic chain, papers resulting from collaborations tend to receive a higher citation count compared to other areas. However, there were notably fewer collaborative connections between authors transitioning from basic to developmental research and beyond. Collaboration models involving universities with enterprises, hospitals, or both are becoming more prevalent in biologics R&D. These models demonstrate effects of similarity and proximity. Additionally, there has been an increase in the involvement of developing countries in the research and development of new biologic drugs on a national and regional scale. Conclusion: New drug R&D research collaboration patterns evolve spontaneously with productivity updates. In the future, it is necessary to enhance the involvement of pharmaceutical companies in the basic research phase of new drug development, continuously strengthen the relationships across all segments of the academic chain, and thoroughly boost the efficiency of transforming new drug R&D into practical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.