ReviewBrain circulation
Vestibular rehabilitation in patients with stroke: A comprehensive review of past and current evidence.
Review in Brain circulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Visuo-Vestibular Virtual Reality-Based Training for People with Stroke: A Feasibility Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Concurrent VVOR and VORS profiling reveals a threshold-dependent VOR suppression deficit in vestibular migraine.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 2016, the American Physical Therapy Association Neurology Section published clinical practice guidelines titled "Vestibular Rehabilitation (VR) for Peripheral Vestibular Hypofunction." These guidelines recommend that physicians should provide VR to individuals with peripheral vestibular hypofunction, emphasizing its importance in managing dysfunctions of the vestibular system. Previous systematic reviews or studies on vestibular function have concluded that VR has positive effects on central vestibular disorders. More recently, a systematic review has found that there are positive effects of VR on ambulatory performance in stroke patients. Evidence is consistently being added regarding the positive impact of VR in patients with a history of stroke who are currently living with dizziness, balance, and gait impairments. However, there are still many unanswered questions in this area. Most studies lack complementary quantitative vestibular function testing and uniform standards for the timing and frequency of the VR. Furthermore, the methods of VR are carried out in a general fashion without catering to the individual, resulting in a lack of understanding of the mechanisms of various VR approaches. In future, much work needs to be done to solve these questions. The objective of this review is to investigate and validate the impact of VR on stroke patients while assessing the associated methodologies for determining its effectiveness. In particular, this review aims to offer a thorough evaluation of the advantages and drawbacks of employing VR in stroke rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.