Trial reportLung Cancer (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Safety Profile of First-Line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Combined with Chemotherapy in Pulmonary Sarcomatoid Carcinoma.
Trial report in Lung Cancer (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence of High Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression in Pulmonary Sarcomatoid Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JTO clinical and research reports · 2026Review
- Clinical features and prognostic factors for spinal metastasis from sarcomatoid carcinoma: identifying candidates suitable for surgical intervention.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- A Population-Based Nomogram for Predicting Overall Survival in Pulmonary Sarcomatoid Carcinoma With Real-World External Validation.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Comparative predictive value of immunotherapy biomarkers: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- The pathogenesis and therapeutic management of rare pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma: a narrative review.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) represents a rare subtype of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and it has poor pathologic differentiation, aggressive progression, and early metastasis. Conventional antitumor therapies demonstrate limited efficacy against PSC, which is frequently associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes. Methods: We conducted an open-label, single-arm Phase II trial. This study has been registered with Clinical Trials (ChiCTR2000031478). Patients received immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combination with chemotherapy, the treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, patient withdrawal, or death. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), with secondary endpoints comprising progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and treatment-emergent adverse events. Results: From March 2021 through August 2023, a total of 38 patients were enrolled. The study comprised predominantly male participants (91%, n=34) with a median age of 65.4 years. Notably, 86.8% (n=33) had smoking histories. The ORR and DCR were 73.7% and 94.7%, respectively. The median PFS was 13.3 months (95% CI, 10.2-15.7) and median OS was not reached. The most common immune-related adverse events were pneumonitis, the incidence of which was 13.2%. The majority of observed AEs were grades 1 or 2 and all AEs were manageable. Only two patients discontinued treatment due to grade 3 immune-related pneumonitis during the study. Conclusion: In our trial, we found that ICI combination with chemotherapy showed robust efficacy alongside acceptable toxicity in advanced-stage PSC. Taken together, ICI combination with chemotherapy could be a better option for PSC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.