ArticleJCPP advances2025
Development of a brief assessment tool to identify children with probable anxiety disorders.
Article in JCPP advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Parent-led CBT delivered via online and telephone support alongside usual school practice versus usual school practice only for young children identified as at risk for anxiety disorders through screening in schools: a cluster randomised controlled trial.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2026Trial
- Italian Validation of the Brief Self-Reported Version of the Spence Children's Anxiety Scale for Children.Journal of clinical psychology · 2026Article
- Towards a more inclusive child and adolescent mental health research: Bridging gaps through neuro-affirmative, transdiagnostic, and participatory frameworks.JCPP advances · 2025Article
- Development of a brief assessment tool to identify children with probable anxiety disorders.JCPP advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Difficulties identifying anxiety disorders in primary-school aged children present significant barriers to timely access to support and intervention. This study aimed to develop a brief assessment tool that can identify children with anxiety disorders in community settings, with a high level of sensitivity and specificity. Methods: Children (aged 8-11 years), and their parents/carers and teachers from 19 primary/junior schools in England each completed a pool of questionnaire items that assessed child anxiety symptoms and associated impact. Diagnostic assessments (Anxiety Disorder Interview Schedule for Children: Child and Parent interviews) were administered by independent assessors to determine the presence/absence of anxiety disorders in children. We created alternative candidate brief child-, parent-, teacher-report questionnaires consisting of the 'best' items selected from the wider pool of completed items. We used exploratory factor analysis to reduce the item pool, and multivariable backward elimination logistic regression to identify items that were the strongest predictors of the presence/absence of an anxiety disorder. Results: Parents/carers of 646 children provided consent; child/parent/teacher-report questionnaires were collected for 582/646/565 children respectively; and diagnostic outcome data were collected for 463 children. None of the brief child- nor teacher-report questionnaires achieved acceptable sensitivity/specificity (<75%). Parent-report questionnaires including between 2 and 9 items that assess anxiety symptoms and/or associated impact achieved acceptable sensitivity and specificity (≥75%). Conclusions: The two-item parent-report measure that assesses distress and impairment associated with anxiety brings the advantage of brevity and has the potential to be used in community settings to improve identification of children with anxiety disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.