ArticleBiofilm2025
Proteomic signatures of
Article in Biofilm, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: molecular mechanisms, resistance determinants, and emerging therapeutic strategies.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Article
- Stage-Dependent Antibiofilm Effects of UVA Combined with Cinnamaldehyde AgainstAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Biofilm formation associated with calcium phosphate coating on implant metals.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026Article
- Biofilms in clinical infection: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and the evolving therapeutic landscape.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2026Review
- Surface Oxide Film and Antibacterial Activity of Zirconium-Based Bulk Metallic Glasses.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2026Article
- Synergistic integration of biomaterials in orthopedic implantation for infection preventing and tissue engineering.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Review
- Bacterial Proteomics and Antibiotic Resistance Identification: Is Single-Cell Analysis a Worthwhile Pursuit?Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Silver multilayer coating on orthopedic implant material of different alloys and surfaces significantly reduces bacterial colonization.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Implant-associated infections pose a significant clinical challenge in the orthopaedic field, often leading to implant failure and revision surgeries. These infections are hard to treat, particularly due to the formation of bacterial biofilms. Orthopaedic implant surfaces feature varying roughness and compositions to optimise implant osseointegration and performance. Highly polished surfaces are used in articulating areas of high shear force to minimise wear particle formation, while rough or porous surfaces enhance implant and bone fixation. However, increased surface roughness or porosity can also promote bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation, potentially elevating the risk of chronic infections. In this study, an automated single-pot solid-phase enhanced sample preparation protocol (SP3) workflow was developed to investigate the differences in proteomic response of immature and mature
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.