ReviewBrain & spine2025
Traumatic central cord Syndrome: An integrated neurosurgical and neurocritical care perspective.
Review in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Surgical Timing and Neurological Outcomes in Traumatic Central Cord Syndrome: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.Global spine journal · 2026Article
- Emerging advances in spinal cord injury: An introductory overview.Brain & spine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traumatic Central Cord Syndrome (TCCS) presents complex challenges in the management of spinal cord injury. Characterized by disproportionate upper limb weakness, TCCS is the most common clinical spinal cord syndrome, typically affecting males in a bimodal age distribution. Mechanisms include hyperextension injuries in older adults with degenerative cervical spine disease and high-energy trauma in younger individuals. Diagnosis is based on neurological assessment, with the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale used for severity classification. Management strategies, including surgical and medical approaches, may influence functional outcomes, although high-quality comparative evidence is limited. Surgical decompression and stabilization are often pursued to relieve mechanical compression, while nonoperative strategies may be considered in selected cases with less severe neurological deficits. The timing of surgical intervention remains a subject of ongoing debate and must be individualized. Neurocritical care considerations are increasingly recognized as potentially important in the early phase of TCCS. Experimental and clinical investigations into intraspinal pressure (ISP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and spinal perfusion pressure (SPP) monitoring suggest these parameters may aid in minimizing secondary injury, though their routine clinical use is not yet established. Complications such as venous thromboembolism, infection, pressure injuries, and autonomic dysfunction are common and require comprehensive management. The role of corticosteroids remains controversial. This narrative review synthesizes current knowledge on TCCS, with emphasis on diagnostic, surgical, and neurocritical care considerations. As the field advances, further evidence is needed to clarify optimal management pathways and improve outcomes in this challenging clinical entity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.