ArticleDiscover health systems2025
Understanding context: leveraging the pragmatic robust implementation sustainability model to inform the implementation of a community-based southeastern preconception counseling intervention to improve maternal health equity.
Article in Discover health systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: One major preconception risk driving poor childbirth outcomes in Black/African American women is cardiovascular health. Preconception counseling (PC) can reduce maternal health inequities, prevent fatal cardiovascular conditions, and improve the overall health of mothers before, during, and after pregnancy. This article examines contextual factors influencing the implementation of a community-based and culturally tailored PC intervention, ensuring equitable access amongst underserved populations. Methods: We used the Practical Robust Implementation Science Model (PRISM) to guide a mixed-methods assessment among community partner sites to inform the implementation of a PC intervention for Black adults in the Southeastern U.S. We developed a regional accountability board (RAB) of community stakeholders and conducted a partner site survey (n = 10) to identify organizational characteristics and group interviews with site staff and community members that receive services at our partner sites. Results: There was strong community and organizational buy-in for the PC intervention. Partner sites indicated moderate capability to implement PC; however, there was a need for enhanced infrastructure and organizational support for implementation, given limited experience providing PC and organizational funding, staff turnover, and lack of on-site medical services. Existing community trust and robust referral networks were major strengths among all sites. Conclusion: Collaborative community partnerships engaged throughout this process surfaced key community priorities, strengths, and needs for PC implementation. Using multiple methods to gather community data and feedback informed iterative revisions to the implementation plans that have positioned partner sites to deliver culturally congruent PC to at-risk communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.