ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Benefit-finding experiences of liver transplant recipients who underwent perioperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment: a qualitative research.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to examine the benefit-finding experiences of liver transplant recipients who undergo perioperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) treatments in order to provide targeted nursing care and promote mental health among these patients. Methods: This study employed the phenomenological research approach within the framework of qualitative research. The determination of the sample size was predicated on achieving information saturation. Between June 2023 and March 2024, eight liver transplant recipients who underwent perioperative ECMO treatment at a qualified liver transplantation hospital in Guangxi were purposively selected for semi-structured interviews. In line with the cognitive adaptation theory, this study employed template analysis as the analytical approach, wherein each word in the text content was meticulously examined and categorized into their respective structures based on the theory's three frameworks. Throughout the analysis process, the researchers continuously refined and adjusted abstract content placed within templates while exploring the potential emergence of new themes. Results: The study involved a total of eight participants, comprising seven male and one female patient, aged between 43 and 68 years. Among the eight patients, seven had grade 3 or higher coronary artery disease, and one had severe arrhythmia, all of which were attributed to heart conditions necessitating ECMO support during liver transplantation. The ECMO types used were exclusively VA, with auxiliary durations varying between 5 h and 9.5 h. Three overarching themes and seven corresponding sub-themes were extracted: (1) the search for meaning, including a strong desire to survive, recognize the meaning of therapy; (2) gaining a sense of mastery, including a sense of control over one's body and psychological; (3) self-enhancement, including perceiving social support, strengthening self-management, and affirming self-worth. Conclusions: Liver transplant recipients who undergo preoperative ECMO treatment can have benefit-finding experiences. This study indicates that medical professionals should not only focus on timely and accurate treatment but also prioritize addressing patients' psychological needs while caring for critically ill individuals. Clinical medical staff can guide patients in engaging in positive psychological construction, exploring and providing effective social support resources, fostering patients' self-health management, and enhancing the level and patients' ability of benefit-finding by strengthening knowledge, education, and establishing psychological mutual assistance platforms after liver transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.