Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40519802›Full record

ArticleClinical psychology in Europe2025

Empirically Informed, Idiographic Networks of Concordant and Discordant Motives: An Experience Sampling Study With Network Analysis in Non-Clinical Participants.

Thies Lüdtke, Fabian Steiner, Thomas Berger, Stefan Westermann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical psychology in Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thies LüdtkeDepartment of Human Medicine, MSH Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2019-3842
Fabian SteinerDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6361-9783
Thomas BergerDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2432-7791
Stefan WestermannDepartment of Psychology and Psychotherapy, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4785-0024

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Case formulations and treatment planning mostly rely on self-reports, observations, and third-party reports. We propose that these data sources can be complemented by idiographic networks of motive interactions, which are empirically derived from everyday life using the Experience Sampling Method (ESM). In these networks, positive edges represent concordance of motives whereas negative edges indicate discordance. Based on consistency theory, which states that discordance emerges when the activity of one motive (e.g., 'affiliation') is incompatible with the activity of another motive (e.g., 'autonomy'), we hypothesized that discordance would be associated with subclinical depressive symptoms. Method: Fifty-one undergraduates completed a six-day ESM assessment period with 6 assessments of motive satisfaction per day. Based on the ESM data, idiographic networks of the seven most important motives per person were computed using mlVAR (https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.mlVAR). We extracted indices of motive dynamics from each person's network, namely the strength of negative edges compared to the overall network strength as well as the values of the single most negative and positive edges. These indices were then used to predict subclinical depressive symptoms, controlling for overall motive satisfaction. Results: Discordant, conflicting motive relationships made up only 6% of network strengths, indicating high concordance overall. Neither conflict index predicted subclinical depressive symptoms but maximum concordance was associated with lower subclinical depressive symptoms. Motive satisfaction was a significant predictor across models. Conclusion: The applicability and clinical utility of the motive network approach was promising. Insufficient variance due to a healthy sample and the small number of observations limit the interpretability of findings.

Indexed as

approachavoidanceconcordanceconflictconsistency theorymotive

Identifiers

PMID40519802
PMCPMC12163690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.