Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40519783›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025

Partial night lighting may reduce the physiological impact of artificial light at night on captive zebra finches.

Rachel R Reid, Neal Dawson, Eleanor Duncan, Robert Gillespie, Christopher Mitchell, Claire J Branston, Pablo Capilla-Lasheras, Jelle Boonekamp, Davide M Dominoni

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rachel R ReidSchool of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, Graham Kerr Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Neal DawsonSchool of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, Graham Kerr Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Eleanor DuncanSchool of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, Graham Kerr Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Robert GillespieSchool of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, Graham Kerr Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Christopher MitchellEnvironment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Cornwall, United Kingdom.
Claire J BranstonSchool of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, Graham Kerr Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Pablo Capilla-LasherasSchool of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, Graham Kerr Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Jelle BoonekampSchool of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, Graham Kerr Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Davide M DominoniSchool of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, Graham Kerr Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Artificial light at night (ALAN) continues to increase at an unprecedented rate globally every year. ALAN can disrupt circadian rhythms and cause behavioural and physiological changes which may have knock on effects for health, yet we still understand very little about these effects. It is becoming increasingly important to investigate potential mitigation strategies, through understanding what aspects of ALAN negatively impact wildlife health. Methods: Here we present the results of an experiment where we investigated the impact of ALAN on various health biomarkers in 44 captive adult zebra finches Results: We show that exposure to full light at night impacted the circadian pattern of glucose levels, with glucose concentrations remaining elevated later into the night compared to the control group. Full light at night also accelerated telomere shortening. However, the relationship between telomere length and treatment only became significant when the partial light at night treatment group was removed and should therefore be interpreted with caution. These effects were not observed under partial light at night. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that partial night lighting may mitigate some of ALAN's negative impacts on wildlife health. This approach could be a valuable tool in future strategies to reduce the ecological effects of light pollution in urban environments and should be investigated further.

Indexed as

artificial lightavian healthavian physiologylight pollutionurban ecology

Identifiers

PMID40519783
PMCPMC12162287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.