ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2025
A novel three-dimensional proximal femoral intramedullary nail (TD-PFIN) system with better biomechanical advantages: a finite element analysis study.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The biomechanical strength of a new three-dimensional proximal femur intramedullary nail (TD-PFIN) was compared with that of the commonly used internal fixation by finite element analysis. Methods: The femur CT imaging data of a healthy volunteer were collected. Three-dimensional full-length femur was conducted by software and osteotomy was performed at the intertrochanteric crest to make AO/OTA 31-A1.1 fracture model. DHS, PFNA, InterTAN and TD-PFIN fixation systems were simultaneously made.TD-PFIN had three head nails, which were vertically and horizontally dispersed in the proximal femur. Normal physiological weight bearing was simulated by finite element analysis, and peak von Mises stress and the maximum displacement in the femur and internal fixation were recorded. Results: An axial load of 700N was applied to the femoral head to simulate normal adult weight. Among the fixation systems, the TD-PFIN had the lowest peak von-Mises stress, which was 111.79 MPa. the DHS model had the highest stress concentration, which was 231.71 MPa. In the Von-Mises stress distribution of the femur, the maximum stress was 14.696 MPa in DHS fixed model and the least was 10.162 MPa in TD-PFIN fixed model. In the displacement distribution of the internal fixations, The DHS model was 3.8991 mm, which was the most. The TD-PFIN fixed model had a minimum displacement of 3.1571m. In the displacement distribution in femur, the DHS internal fixation model was the largest (4.017 mm). The TD-PFIN fixed mod was the smallest (3.1886 mm). Conclusion: TD-PFIN designed by us had the characteristics of multi-plane fixed, with better anti-rotation ability. Its mechanical stability was better than DHS, PFNA, and InterTAN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.