Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40519712›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of heart failure2025

Comparison of High Versus Low Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Acute Heart Failure: Rationale and Design of the HELP-AHF Trial.

Junho Hyun, In-Cheol Kim, Ah-Ram Kim, Hee Jeong Lee, Sang Eun Lee, Sung-Cheol Yun, Min-Seok Kim

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04853563 (Comparison of High VErsus Low Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Acute Heart Failure), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04853563 naunknown statusnot on this map

Comparison of High VErsus Low Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Acute Heart Failure (HELP-AFH) : Open-label Randomized Controlled Multi-center Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAsan Medical CenterRan2021 to 2024Enrolled120ConditionsHeart Decompensation, Mechanical Ventilation Pressure HighArmsPEEP
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Junho HyunDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4211-3081
In-Cheol KimDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Center, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5751-2328
Ah-Ram KimDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2489-948X
Hee Jeong LeeDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Center, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0243-6954
Sang Eun LeeDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7290-2463
Sung-Cheol YunDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8503-109X
Min-Seok KimDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0860-3650

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) often necessitates invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) due to respiratory failure. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is a critical component in MV management; however, the optimal PEEP level for patients with ADHF remains unclear. The High vErsus Low Positive end-expiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated patients with Acute Heart Failure (HELP-AHF) trial is a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled study designed to compare the efficacy and safety of high versus low PEEP strategies in this population. Methods: A total of 120 patients with ADHF requiring MV within 24 hours of initiation will be randomized 1:1 to a high PEEP group (target: 10 cmH Results: The primary outcome is ventilator-free days at day 28. Key secondary outcomes include in-hospital mortality, duration of intensive care unit and hospital stay, vasoactive-inotropic support, and rates of heart transplantation or left ventricular assist device implantation. Safety outcomes include hemodynamic instability requiring mechanical circulatory support, pulmonary complications, and weaning-related adverse events. Conclusions: This HELP-AHF trial aims to provide valuable insights into optimal PEEP strategies in ADHF patients receiving invasive MV. Findings from this study have the potential to inform ventilatory management practices and improve outcomes in this high-risk population. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04853563.

Indexed as

Heart failureMechanical ventilationPositive end-expiratory pressure

Identifiers

PMID40519712
PMCPMC12160051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.