Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40519698›Full record

ReviewEye and brain2025

Ocular Dominance Plasticity: A Mini-Review.

Seung Hyun Min

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Eye and brain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Motor cortex rTMS modulates adult ocular dominance plasticity.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Seung Hyun MinDepartment of Psychology, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ocular dominance plasticity, the ability of the brain to change sensory eye balance, has traditionally been believed to be extremely limited in adult visual cortex. However, recent studies on short-term monocular deprivation (MD) demonstrate that its presence is prevalent in adult humans, as short-term MD is capable of significantly shifting ocular dominance in favor of the previously deprived eye. Thus, findings over the last 15 years highlight that short-term MD can be a promising alternative treatment for amblyopia, a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by binocular imbalance. Conventionally, amblyopia has been treated with patching therapy, which shows limited effectiveness in restoring binocularity of adults and is associated with poor compliance rate and high psychosocial distress. Thus, it is an opportune time to explore how short-term MD can be utilized as an alternative treatment option for restoring amblyopic vision, especially individuals who do not respond robustly to standard treatment. This review provides an overview of foundational studies on ocular dominance plasticity in both visually intact and impaired observers. It also evaluates the potential of short-term MD as a treatment for amblyopia and suggests its future research directions, including the integration of multimodal therapeutic strategies that include short-term MD.

Indexed as

amblyopiabinocular visionocular dominance plasticity

Identifiers

PMID40519698
PMCPMC12166856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.