Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40519674›Full record

ArticleTransplantation direct2025

Bridging the Gap: The State of Global Transplant Research Collaboration.

Isabella Faria, Stalin Canizares, Adriana Montalvan, Paulo N Martins, Griffin M Weber, Marwan Kazimi, Devin E Eckhoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation direct, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Kidney Transplantation in Western Balkans: A Regional Blueprint for Access, Capacity, and Equity.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Isabella FariaDivision of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3073-5636
Stalin CanizaresDivision of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4706-862X
Adriana MontalvanDivision of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1415-5612
Paulo N MartinsDepartment of Surgery, University of Oklahoma , Oklahoma City, OK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9333-0233
Griffin M WeberDivision of Interdisciplinary Medicine and Biotechnology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2597-881X
Marwan KazimiDivision of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2780-5952
Devin E EckhoffDivision of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2621-1431

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The field of transplant research has long been recognized for its innovative approaches and international collaborations. This study aims to dissect the landscape of global collaborations within transplant research during a past decade. Methods: Through a comprehensive bibliometric and network analysis of 5 high-impact factor transplantation journals from 2012 to 2021, we evaluated scientific production and collaboration patterns in 9 250 articles. International, national, and single-institution collaboration types were analyzed, using coauthorship as a measure of scientific collaboration. Results: The data set revealed 40 622 authors from 2 094 institutions across 94 countries, with a marked increase in international collaborations during the past decade. The United States and Western European countries emerged as central nodes in the global network, facilitating the majority of collaborative efforts. Only 2.2% of potential institutional collaborations were explored during the decade. We found a lower chance of citations for single-institution research over time. Low- and middle-income countries were underrepresented in high-impact transplant research. Conclusions: The findings underscore the necessity of fostering inclusive, equitable research collaborations that bridge the gap between high-income countries and low- and middle-income countries, limiting their contributions to advancing global patient care. Practical recommendations for enhancing global collaboration in transplant research include facilitating academic exchanges, equitable collaboration practices, and increased funding opportunities. This study calls for a strategic shift toward a more inclusive and integrated global research landscape, aiming to advance transplant research and patient care universally. Addressing these disparities could lead to a more integrated global research landscape, benefiting transplant research and patient care universally.

Identifiers

PMID40519674
PMCPMC12165660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.