Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40519670›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging2025

Convergent and predictive validity of the activities-specific balance confidence scales and balance recovery confidence scale, with regard to the falls efficacy scale-international: a cross-sectional study.

Hazel Xu Teng Ting, Jiaying Ho, Peck Hoon Ong, William R Young, Shawn Leng Hsien Soh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hazel Xu Teng TingRehabilitation Services, Yishun Community Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Jiaying HoHealth and Social Sciences Cluster, Singapore Institute of Technology, Singapore, Singapore.
Peck Hoon OngHealth and Social Sciences Cluster, Singapore Institute of Technology, Singapore, Singapore.
William R YoungPublic Health and Sport Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Shawn Leng Hsien SohHealth and Social Sciences Cluster, Singapore Institute of Technology, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the convergent validity between the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale, Balance Recovery Confidence (BRC) Scale and Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I), which are assessment tools used to measure the constructs of falls efficacy and concerns about falling. The study also investigated the predictive validity of ABC and BRC on concerns about falling. One hundred and thirty-one older adults (mean age of 73.5 years, SD 4.98) completed the three scales and self-reported their demographic data. 63.4% were female. The convergent validity between the ABC, BRC, and FES-I scales was investigated using Pearson correlation coefficients. Predictive validity was investigated using regression models. Findings indicated strong correlation between ABC and FES-I (r = -0.794, p < 0.001), and moderate correlation between BRC and FES-I (r = -0.587, p < 0.001) and ABC and BRC (r = 0.642, p < 0.001). ABC (

Indexed as

balance confidencebalance recovery confidencecommunity-dwellingconcerns about fallingfalls efficacyolder adults, fall preventionpsychological constructspsychometric

Identifiers

PMID40519670
PMCPMC12162644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.