ArticleBiotechnology notes (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2025
Modeling and simulation of soft bio-mimetic fingers with a novel soft thumb design for bionic hand applications using ANN.
Article in Biotechnology notes (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The paper presents a novel design for a soft bio-mimetic finger and soft thumb structure for bionic hand applications. It introduces an anthropomorphic pneumatic flexible finger system using a PneuNets framework to enhance flexibility and maneuverability. The research investigates the influence of geometric variations (wall thickness, chamber number, and spacing) on finger deformation, demonstrating that reduced wall thickness and augmented chambers substantially improve flexibility. A key innovation is the soft thumb design that accurately replicates the complex movements of the Carpometacarpal (CMC) joint, enabling natural opposition and dexterity. Eight models were developed for four fingers and two models for the thumb. Simulation results indicate that models with thinner walls (2 mm) achieve bending angles exceeding 80° at 120 KPa, whereas 3 mm models remain below 50°. Moreover, increasing the number of chambers enhances deformation, with each added chamber contributing approximately 41 % more flexibility. For the thumb models, we successfully mapped the motion ranges and accurately mimicked the base joint, enabling natural opposition and dexterity. Furthermore, the paper also integrates Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) to model forward kinematics, improving the estimation of bending angles and end-tip positions, which enhances the overall adaptability and control of the system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.