ArticleFrontiers in network physiology2025
What goes on when the lights go off? Using machine learning techniques to characterize a child's settling down period.
Article in Frontiers in network physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Behavioral Sleep Interventions for Neurodivergent Youth: A Narrative Review.Current sleep medicine reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Current approaches to objective measurement of sleep disturbances in children overlook the period prior to sleep, or the settling down time. Using machine learning techniques, we identified key features that characterize differences in activity during the settling down period that differentiate children with sensory sensitivities to tactile input (SS) and children without sensitivities (NSS). Methods: Actigraphy data were collected from children with SS (n = 17) and children with NSS (n = 18) over 2 weeks (a total of 430 evenings). The settling down period, indicated using caregiver report and actigraphy indices, was isolated each evening and seven features (mean magnitude, maximum magnitude, kurtosis, skewness, Shannon entropy, standard deviation, and interquartile range) were extracted. 10-fold cross-validation with random forests were used to determine accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of differentiating groups. Results: We could accurately differentiate groups (accuracy = 83%, specificity = 83%, sensitivity = 84%). Feature importance maps identify that children with SS have higher maximum bouts of activity (U = -2.23, p = 0.026) during the settling down time and a higher variance in activity for the children with SS (e.g., interquartile range, Shannon entropy) that sets them apart from their peers. Conclusion: We present a novel use of machine learning techniques that successfully uncovered differentiating features within the settling down period for our groups. These differences have been difficult to capture using standard sleep and rest-activity metrics. Our data suggests that activity during the settling down period may be a unique target for future research for children with SS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.