Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40519565›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in toxicology2025

Prediction of the classification, labelling and packaging regulation H-statements with confidence using conformal prediction with N-grams and molecular fingerprints.

Ulf Norinder, Ziye Zheng, Ian Cotgreave

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ulf NorinderDepartment of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University, P.O. Box 1073, SE-164 25 Kista, Sweden.
Ziye ZhengCytiva, Björkgatan 30, 75 323 Uppsala, Sweden.
Ian CotgreaveChemical and Pharmaceutical Safety, Research Institute of Sweden (RISE), Forskargatan 18, 15 136 Södertälje, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective chemical hazard labelling systems are essential for safeguarding human health and the environment as a result of widespread chemical use, and machine-learning models can be used to predict hazard labels efficiently and reduce the use of animal tests. This investigation shows the utility of N-grams and other fingerprint featurization procedures for predicting classification, labelling and packaging (CLP). Regulation H-statements, particularly in an ensemble (consensus) setting. Consensus modelling by class or Conformal Prediction median p-values seems to be particularly advantageous in order to obtain both high conformal prediction validity and efficiency as well as good balanced accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. Utilization of the N-grams allows handling of all symbols in SMILES strings including those related to metals and salts that may be important for the compounds to exhibit their experimental determined toxicities. The models developed in this study are efficient tools to access hazard classification H-statements of chemicals, which can be useful for chemical hazard assessment, read-across as well as risk management.

Indexed as

CLP RegulationConformal predictionConsensus modelingH-statementsMolecular fingerprintsN-gramsRandom forest

Identifiers

PMID40519565
PMCPMC12163164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.