ReviewSurgery open science2025
Surgical trainee education in benign anorectal disease: a scoping review.
Review in Surgery open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Benign anorectal diseases such as haemorrhoids, perianal abscesses and fistulas are prevalent and disabling conditions that can be difficult to diagnose and treat.This review aims to evaluate current education for training doctors around these diseases to inform the revision and development of surgical curricula. Materials and methods: A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase and Google Scholar and data from included articles were charted in a semi-structured table. Quantitative outcomes were presented using simple descriptive statistics. Qualitative data were analysed using a reflexive thematic analysis framework. Results: Ten studies were included. Most education was centred around haemorrhoids and delivered in the format of lectures and simulations. Harnessing the benefits of both on-demand and in-person content was key to optimising education delivery. In simulation studies, low-fidelity models were generally sufficient to meet educational objectives. There was universal agreement that the purpose of education was to supplement or prepare for clinical exposure, rather than to replace or 'bridge gaps' in experience. Education was found to be most useful and relevant when delivered to junior surgical or non-surgical cohorts. Conclusions: This review elucidates gaps in current literature on benign anorectal disease education and provides recommendations for the development and implementation of future education for surgical trainees. There is a need for education that addresses a broader range of anorectal conditions and has a greater focus on the retention and clinical translation of acquired knowledge and skills. Interventions should be designed to enhance clinical exposure and maintain relevance throughout training progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.