Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40519526›Full record

ArticleBJA open2025

A GAP analysis of the current state of Pain Management Services in the UK, 2024.

Sue Copley, Beatrice Bretherton, Suzanne Carty, Matthew Brown, Sailesh Mishra, Emmy Kato Clarke, Ganesan Baranidharan, Devjit Srivastava, GAP Analysis Working Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sue CopleyFaculty of Pain Medicine, London, UK.
Beatrice BrethertonFaculty of Pain Medicine, London, UK.
Suzanne CartyAnaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Somerset, UK.
Matthew BrownPain Medicine, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Sailesh MishraAnaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Emmy Kato ClarkeFaculty Pain Medicine, London, UK.
Ganesan BaranidharanPain Medicine, University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Devjit SrivastavaDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Raigmore Hospital, Inverness, UK.
GAP Analysis Working Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In the UK, multidisciplinary services for patients experiencing chronic pain are currently commissioned by the NHS as specialised services. Pain services across the UK were placed under significant strain during the COVID pandemic. The 'GAP Analysis working group' (GAP group) was commissioned by the Board of the Faculty of Pain Medicine (FPM) in November 2021 to evaluate the post-COVID state of pain services across the country. Methods: The GAP group's remit was to establish any deficit in pain services when measured against the service 'gold standard' outlined in the published FPM document 'Core Standards for Pain Management Services volume 2.0' (CSPMS). A survey was developed using an iterative consensus process among the group and was distributed to all FPM members. Results: The survey included questions pertaining to 21 standards. There were 164 respondents to this GAP analysis from 97 individual clinical sites delivering pain services in the UK. The majority of respondents worked in secondary care (74%), followed by tertiary care (23%) and finally primary care (3%). No single standard was met by all reporting sites. The degree of compliance with individual standards varied, ranging from only 30% of sites reporting full compliance (standard 9: research and development) to 79% of sites reporting full compliance (standard 21: interventional pain procedure). Conclusions: The following aspects of chronic pain services need urgent redress: provision of paediatric pain services, provision of cancer pain services, outcome data management support, research and development, and increased support of psychological services and pain management programme access.

Indexed as

acute painchronic painGAP analysispain managementpain medicine

Identifiers

PMID40519526
PMCPMC12163339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.