Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40519510›Full record

ArticleBMJ medicine2024

Pregnant women admitted to hospital with covid-19 in 10 European countries: individual patient data meta-analysis of population based cohorts in International Obstetric Survey Systems.

Hilde Marie Engjom, Odette de Bruin, Rema Ramakrishnan, Anna J M Aabakke, Outi Äyräs, Catherine Deneux-Tharaux, Serena Donati, Marian Knight, Eva Jonasdottir, Teresia Svanvik and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Hilde Marie EngjomDivision of Mental and Physical Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-1582-4283
Odette de BruinDepartment of Obstetrics, Birth Centre Wilhelminas Children's Hospital, Division Woman and Baby, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Rema RamakrishnanNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Anna J M AabakkeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Holbæk, Kobenhavn, Denmark.
Outi ÄyräsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Catherine Deneux-TharauxObstetric, Perinatal and Paediatric Epidemiology, Centre for Research on Epidemiology and Statistics, National Institute of Health and Medical Research, Paris, France.
Serena DonatiNational Centre for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Istituto Superiore di Sanità - Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Marian KnightNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1984-4575
Eva JonasdottirDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Landspitali National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Teresia SvanvikDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Goteborg, Sweden.
An VercoutereDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hopital Erasme, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Nicola VousdenNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5216-8268
Kitty Wm BloemenkampDepartment of Obstetrics, Birth Centre Wilhelminas Children's Hospital, Division Woman and Baby, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1377-4625
INOSS covid-19 in pregnancy working group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the incidence of hospital admissions for covid-19 disease in pregnant women, severity of covid-19 disease, and medical treatment provided to pregnant women with moderate to severe covid-19 during the first 10 months of the pandemic. Design: Individual patient data meta-analysis of population based cohorts in International Obstetric Survey Systems. Setting: 10 European countries with national or regional surveillance within the International Obstetric Survey Systems (INOSS) collaboration using aligned definitions and case report forms: Belgium, France (regional), Italy, the Netherlands, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden (regional), and the UK. The dominant variant of the SARS-CoV-2 virus was the wild-type variant in all countries during the study period (1 March 2020 to 31 December 2020). Participants: The source population was 1.7 million women giving birth (maternities) from 1 March 2020 to 31 December 2020; pregnant women were included if they were admitted to hospital and had a positive polymerase chain reaction test for the SARS-CoV-2 virus ≤7 days before hospital admission, during admission, or up to two days after giving birth. We further categorised the hospital admission in two groups; covid-19 admission (hospital admission due to covid-19 or with reported symptoms of covid-19 disease) or non-covid-19 admission (admission to hospital for obstetric healthcare or no symptoms of covid-19 disease). Main outcome measures: Incidence of hospital admissions for covid-19 per 1000 maternities, frequency of moderate to severe covid-19 disease, and number of women who received specific medical treatment for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Moderate to severe covid-19 disease was defined as maternal death, admission to an intensive care unit, or need for respiratory support. Results: Among 1.7 million maternities, 9003 women were included in the study: 2350 (26.1%) were admitted to hospital because of covid-19 disease or had symptoms of disease. The pooled incidence of hospital admissions for covid-19 per 1000 maternities was 0.8 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.5 to 1.2, τ Conclusions: Population based surveillance in 10 European countries during the first 10 months of the covid-19 pandemic showed variations in the risk of hospital admissions for covid-19 in pregnant women. This finding indicates that national public health policies likely had a substantial and previously unrecognised role in protecting pregnant women. Few pregnant women with moderate to severe covid-19 were given specific medical treatment for SARS-CoV-2 disease, even when there were no or minor safety concerns. Lessons for future pandemics include the importance of rapid, robust surveillance systems for maternal and perinatal health, and of including use for pregnant women early in the development and testing of medicines and vaccines for public health emergencies.

Indexed as

COVID-19Pregnancy complicationsPublic health

Identifiers

PMID40519510
PMCPMC12164325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.