ArticleCureus2025
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Safety, Efficacy, and Outcomes: A 10-Year Experience of a Tertiary Care Center in South Lebanon.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of explainable machine learning models for predicting mid-term stone recurrence after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a retrospective observational cohort study.International urology and nephrology · 2026Observational
- Effects of micro-channel negative pressure sheath percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal stones: risk factors for postoperative complications.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the gold standard for treating large and complex renal stones. This study presents a comprehensive analysis of 221 PCNL procedures performed over a decade (2014-2024) at a tertiary healthcare center in South Lebanon, focusing on safety, efficacy, and factors influencing outcomes. Patients aged 15-80 years were included, with variables such as stone characteristics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes analyzed. The mean patient age was 50 ± 16 years. The mean stone size was 3.1 ± 1.1 cm, with single stones most common (n = 82, 37.1%). The mean operative time was 2.1 ± 0.9 hours, and the average postoperative hospital stay was 2.7 ± 1.2 days. Complication rates were low (3.6%), with only one grade IV complication reported. The stone-free rate one month postoperatively was 82.35% (n = 182), with a mean residual stone size of 0.81 ± 0.32 cm, and only 8.1% (n = 18) of patients required second interventions. Regression analysis highlighted the significant influence of surgical team experience on reducing operative time, while larger stone sizes were associated with longer procedures. Compared to international benchmarks, the study demonstrated shorter operative times, lower complication rates, and comparable stone-free outcomes, emphasizing the role of expertise, advanced technologies, and structured preoperative protocols. These findings underscore the safety and efficacy of PCNL in the studied population. The study calls for the establishment of universal benchmarks for PCNL safety and efficacy, alongside multicenter studies, to optimize clinical practices and standardize outcomes for better patient care globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.