Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40519486›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Assessment of Chromosomal Aberrations and S-phase Fraction in Patients With Esophageal Cancer.

Gaurav Deora, Vasudha Sambyal, Kamlesh Guleria, Jagjeet Kaur, Manjit S Uppal, Meena Sudan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gaurav DeoraDepartment of Human Genetics, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, IND.
Vasudha SambyalDepartment of Human Genetics, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, IND.
Kamlesh GuleriaDepartment of Human Genetics, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, IND.
Jagjeet KaurDepartment of Human Genetics, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, IND.
Manjit S UppalDepartment of Surgery, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Amritsar, IND.
Meena SudanDepartment of Radiotherapy, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Amritsar, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe varying pace of cell proliferation influences cancer development and persistent growth. S-phase fraction (SPF) refers to the percentage of cells in a tumor in the cell cycle phase, during which DNA is synthesized. SPF has been correlated with nuclear grade, tumor size, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, metastasis, and clinical response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Aberrations in the number and structure of chromosomes are a common feature of cells from solid tumors. The evaluation of the frequency of chromosomal aberrations in peripheral lymphocytes has been reported as a sensitive cytogenetic assay indicating cancer progression, especially in blood cancer. The present study assessed the correlation between chromosomal aberrations in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) and SPF in the tumor tissue of esophageal cancer patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe present study included 172 subjects, 86 esophageal cancer patients and 86 unrelated age-gender-matched healthy controls. Cytogenetic analysis was done in 172 subjects after 72 hours of peripheral lymphocyte culturing and Giemsa-Trypsin Giemsa banding. SPF was performed in 86 tissue/biopsy samples of esophageal cancer patients using the in vitro bromodeoxyuridine technique.

resultsChromosomal aberrations were higher in esophageal cancer patients than in healthy controls. The mean (%) aberrant metaphases were significantly higher in patients (35.5 ± 13.3) than in controls (16.0 ± 6.6; p<0.0001). Similarly, mean (%) metaphases with structural aberrations were 16.3 ± 12.0 in patients versus 7.6 ± 5.0 in controls (p<0.0001), while mean (%) metaphases with numerical aberrations were 14.5 ± 7.4 in patients compared to 7.3 ± 4.3 in controls (p<0.0001), and mean (%) metaphases with both structural and numerical aberrations in patients were 4.8 ± 3.5 versus 1.1 ± 1.3 in controls (p<0.0001). Karyotype analysis revealed a higher frequency of chromosomal aberrations, including loss, gain, break, gap, deletion, addition, and translocations, affecting chromosomes 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, X, and Y in esophageal cancer patients. The mean SPF for stage I, stage II, stage III, and stage IV was 8.0±5.0, 8.2±4.8, 8.7 ± 4.2, and 10.8 ± 6.7, respectively. There was no significant difference in the mean SPF among different stages of esophageal cancer patients. However, it was in concordance with the pathological stage of the patients being lowest for the stage I patients and highest for the stage IV patients. The chromosomal aberrations in PBL were also lower in stage I (10%) and higher in stage IV (67%) patients.

conclusionsChromosomal aberrations obtained in lymphocytes of esophageal cancer patients showed highly significant differences from those of unrelated healthy controls. The SPF values were higher during the disease progression, with a corresponding high and increasing chromosomal instability in lymphocytes.

Indexed as

chromosomal instabilityesophageal cancerperipheral blood lymphocytess-phase fractiontumor tissue

Identifiers

PMID40519486
PMCPMC12167432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.