ArticleCureus2025
Acute Perforated Large Bowel Obstruction Due to Colorectal Malignancy: A Surgical Emergency With Options.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute large bowel obstruction caused by colorectal cancer is a critical surgical emergency, often presenting as a life-threatening condition. This case involves a 71-year-old male who presented to the emergency department with complete large bowel obstruction secondary to a sigmoid mass, raising concern for malignancy. Initial plans were made for decompression and colonoscopy. However, the patient left the hospital against medical advice and subsequently returned two days later with massive abdominal distension and peritonitis. Emergent exploratory celiotomy revealed a septic abdomen with gross contamination due to perforation in the ascending colon near the hepatic flexure, which was not amenable to repair. At a minimum, a subtotal colectomy was required. The patient underwent a single-stage oncologic subtotal colectomy with a hand-sewn ileosigmoid anastomosis and fascial closure. Pathologic evaluation confirmed stage IIb invasive sigmoid adenocarcinoma with negative margins and 0/43 lymph nodes. The patient was discharged on postoperative day nine without complications. For patients presenting with abdominal sepsis from fecal contamination caused by large bowel perforation due to sigmoid malignancy and obstruction, surgical management options vary widely. These range from damage control surgery with multiple subsequent procedures to single-stage resection and anastomosis. This case underscores the importance of individualized, careful decision-making both preoperatively and intraoperatively. It highlights the factors to consider when evaluating the feasibility of single-stage oncologic surgery and the risks associated with performing a primary anastomosis during emergent operations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.