Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40519461›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Thirst in ICU Patients: A Scoping Review.

Megumi Horinouchi, Hideaki Sakuramoto, Ayako Fukushima, Shun Yoshihara, Kohei Kajiwara, Megumi Mukoyama, Mayumi Koyanagi, Aiko Mihara, Yuta Imamura

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Megumi HorinouchiDepartment of Nursing, Hospital of the University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, JPN.
Hideaki SakuramotoDivision of Faculty Development and Nursing, Kindai University, Osaka, JPN.
Ayako FukushimaDepartment of Nursing, Hokkaido University of Science, Sapporo, JPN.
Shun YoshiharaDepartment of Critical Care and Disaster Nursing, Japanese Red Cross Kyushu International College of Nursing, Munakata, JPN.
Kohei KajiwaraFaculty of Nursing, Shimonoseki City University, Shimonoseki, JPN.
Megumi MukoyamaDepartment of Nursing, Japanese Red Cross Fukuoka Hospital, Fukuoka, JPN.
Mayumi KoyanagiDepartment of Nursing, Fukuoka Tokushukai Hospital, Kasuga, JPN.
Aiko MiharaDepartment of Nursing, Kurume University Hospital, Kurume, JPN.
Yuta ImamuraDepartment of Nursing, National Hospital Organization Kumamoto Medical Center, Kumamoto, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thirst is one of the most frequently experienced symptoms among patients in intensive care units. Previous reviews of thirst in ICU patients and interventions to alleviate thirst had certain limitations. Therefore, we aimed to systematically explore and map the literature on the prevalence, risk factors, specific measurement methods, and intervention strategies for thirst in ICU patients and to identify areas where further research is needed. A scoping review was conducted to limit the search to studies published by August 2, 2024. A literature search was performed using PubMed, CINAHL, CENTRAL, and Igaku Chuo Zasshi databases. Two reviewers independently screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and extracted data from the selected studies. A total of 53 studies met the eligibility criteria. The combined prevalence of thirst, reported in 11 studies, was 66% (95% CI: 56-76). Four studies reported the risk factors for thirst, including sepsis, gastrointestinal disease, analgesics, diuretics, hyperglycemia, and elevated serum sodium levels, through multivariable analysis. The intensity of thirst and degree of distress were measured using the Numerical Rating Scale, the Visual Analog Scale, and the Likert scale in many studies. The interventions primarily consisted of oral and lip moisturization via sprays and swabs with cold water, many of which were bundled or packaged. The frequency of moisturization interventions for thirst varied from every 30 minutes over a three-hour period to three times a day, and it remained unclear which intervention frequency was the most effective. Other interventions included early oral intake, humidification, and use of music and virtual reality. None of the studies included interventions, such as medication adjustments or electrolyte correction, despite these being recognized as potential risk factors. Future studies should validate the measurement methods and develop objective measurement tools. The intervention types and frequencies that are most effective for treating thirst in ICU patients are unclear. Therefore, further research is required to evaluate the type, timing, and frequency of interventions while considering the identified risk factors.

Indexed as

critical careintensive care unitscoping reviewsymptomthirst

Identifiers

PMID40519461
PMCPMC12166508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.