ReviewCureus2025
Thirst in ICU Patients: A Scoping Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Risk factors of thirst amongst critically ill and patients undergoing surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Irish journal of medical science · 2026Pooled it
- Persistent Thirst and Its Clinical Correlates in Critically Ill Adults: A Prospective Observational Study.Nursing in critical care · 2026Observational
- Effectiveness of a Thirst Relief Program in Reducing Thirst Intensity and Distress Among ICU Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.SAGE open nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thirst is one of the most frequently experienced symptoms among patients in intensive care units. Previous reviews of thirst in ICU patients and interventions to alleviate thirst had certain limitations. Therefore, we aimed to systematically explore and map the literature on the prevalence, risk factors, specific measurement methods, and intervention strategies for thirst in ICU patients and to identify areas where further research is needed. A scoping review was conducted to limit the search to studies published by August 2, 2024. A literature search was performed using PubMed, CINAHL, CENTRAL, and Igaku Chuo Zasshi databases. Two reviewers independently screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and extracted data from the selected studies. A total of 53 studies met the eligibility criteria. The combined prevalence of thirst, reported in 11 studies, was 66% (95% CI: 56-76). Four studies reported the risk factors for thirst, including sepsis, gastrointestinal disease, analgesics, diuretics, hyperglycemia, and elevated serum sodium levels, through multivariable analysis. The intensity of thirst and degree of distress were measured using the Numerical Rating Scale, the Visual Analog Scale, and the Likert scale in many studies. The interventions primarily consisted of oral and lip moisturization via sprays and swabs with cold water, many of which were bundled or packaged. The frequency of moisturization interventions for thirst varied from every 30 minutes over a three-hour period to three times a day, and it remained unclear which intervention frequency was the most effective. Other interventions included early oral intake, humidification, and use of music and virtual reality. None of the studies included interventions, such as medication adjustments or electrolyte correction, despite these being recognized as potential risk factors. Future studies should validate the measurement methods and develop objective measurement tools. The intervention types and frequencies that are most effective for treating thirst in ICU patients are unclear. Therefore, further research is required to evaluate the type, timing, and frequency of interventions while considering the identified risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.