Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40519457›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Feasibility of Laparoscopically Assisted Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in Patients for Whom Endoscopic Gastrostomy Is Difficult: A Retrospective Study.

Akira Kameyama, Seijiro Yoshifuku, Masatake Miyamoto, Sasahara Kotaro, Otagiri Noriaki, Yasunori Nishida, Katsunori Tauchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Akira KameyamaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto, JPN.
Seijiro YoshifukuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto, JPN.
Masatake MiyamotoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto, JPN.
Sasahara KotaroDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto, JPN.
Otagiri NoriakiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto, JPN.
Yasunori NishidaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto, JPN.
Katsunori TauchiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is a widely used technique for long-term enteral nutrition. However, some patients have anatomical or pathological conditions making standard percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy infeasible. Traditionally, open gastrostomy (Open-G) has been performed in these cases, although it is more invasive. Laparoscopically assisted percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (LAPEG) has recently been introduced as an alternative. This study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of LAPEG and Open-G in patients for whom percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy was deemed difficult. Methodology A retrospective review was conducted of all patients undergoing gastrostomy at our institution between January 2016 and February 2025. Among 378 total gastrostomies, 16 were classified as

Indexed as

gastrostomylaparoscopically assisted peglaparoscopyopen gastrostomypercutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy

Identifiers

PMID40519457
PMCPMC12167075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.