Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40519431›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Prospective Assessment of Gonadotropin Therapy and Its Outcome in Nonobstructive Azoospermic Patients.

Ahsan Ahmad, Bhramita Roy, Gaurav Babelay, Kumar Dheeraj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ahsan AhmadDepartment of Urology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, IND.
Bhramita RoyDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, IND.
Gaurav BabelayDepartment of Urology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, IND.
Kumar DheerajDepartment of Urology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The absence of spermatozoa in the ejaculate after centrifugation is known as azoospermia. The primary purpose of the study was to determine the recombinant gonadotropin therapy on stimulating spermatogenesis in nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) patients having spermatogenic failure. Additionally, the treatment's clinical outcome and potential adverse effects were evaluated. Materials and methods It was a prospective single-arm observational study and included 20 patients. The study is conducted at the Department of Urology and Infertility Clinics, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences (IGIMS), Patna, Bihar, India. It lasted over the period from November 2023 to December 2024. The institutional ethics committee (IEC) of IGIMS granted ethical approval under letter number 1271/IEC/IGIMS/2023, dated 05 October 2023. Results The mean age of the patients in our study was 31.45 ± 4.82 years. The mean initial follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level was 16.69±6.02 IU/l, the mean initial luteinizing hormone (LH) was 9.85 ± 1.95 IU/l, and the mean testosterone level at baseline was found to be 9.95 ± 2.54 nmol/l. The association of sperm extraction with late maturation arrest compared to other histopathological findings was found to be statistically significant with a p-value of <0.001. Conclusion It was concluded in the study that gonadotropin therapy is helpful in very selected cases of nonobstructive azoospermia. For men with NOA and spermatogenic failure, recombinant gonadotropin therapy appears to be a useful method of overcoming infertility.

Indexed as

azoospermiainfertilitymalenonobstructive azoospermiaspermatozoa

Identifiers

PMID40519431
PMCPMC12163357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.