Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40519404›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Pacemaker Lead Perforation Presenting as Persistent Abdominal Pain: A Case Report.

Drew W Barron, Nathan G Rasmussen, Mark H Auerbach, Douglas Rappaport, Wayne A Martini

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Drew W BarronEmergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Scottsdale, USA.
Nathan G RasmussenEmergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Scottsdale, USA.
Mark H AuerbachEmergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, USA.
Douglas RappaportEmergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, USA.
Wayne A MartiniEmergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac pacemakers are widely used, and lead perforation is a rare but serious complication that may present atypically, leading to diagnostic challenges. We present the case of a 79-year-old male with a history of multiple comorbidities, including heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, right bundle branch block, and recent dual-chamber pacemaker implantation, who developed persistent left upper quadrant abdominal pain. Despite multiple ED visits and specialist evaluations, no clear etiology was identified. Previous outside hospital diagnostic workups, including electrocardiography, chest radiography, and CT, failed to reveal an acute cause for his symptoms. Ultimately, CT imaging in our ED demonstrated migration of the right atrial pacemaker lead, with positioning suggestive of myocardial perforation. The patient was admitted for further management, remained hemodynamically stable with pain controlled, and was conservatively monitored without immediate intervention. Myocardial perforation due to pacemaker leads can occur acutely, subacutely, or as a delayed complication. While early perforation may be identified during implantation or shortly thereafter, subacute and chronic cases often present with non-specific symptoms, making diagnosis challenging. Imaging modalities such as CXR, echocardiography, and CT play a critical role in identifying lead migration. Management strategies range from conservative observation in stable patients to surgical or transvenous lead extraction in symptomatic or high-risk cases. This case stresses the importance of considering pacemaker-lead migration as a potential etiology in patients presenting with unexplained pain after implantation. It also highlights the limitations of conventional diagnostic tools and the value of advanced imaging techniques, such as CT, in the timely identification of this complication.

Indexed as

cardiac device complicationscomputed tomographymyocardial perforationpacemaker lead perforationpacemaker migrationpersistent abdominal pain

Identifiers

PMID40519404
PMCPMC12166111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.