Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40519378›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Double Aortic Contour in Chest Radiography.

Thomas Saliba, David Rotzinger, Denis Tack

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thomas SalibaRadiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, CHE.
David RotzingerRadiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, CHE.
Denis TackRadiology, Centre Hospitalier EpiCURA - site de Ath, Ath, BEL.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mediastinal lymphadenopathy may manifest subtly on routine chest radiographs, particularly when arising in the left paraaortic region, where the normal pleural reflection across the aortic arch ("left paraaortic stripe") can be obscured. We report the case of an 82-year-old man with a history of renal cell carcinoma in remission who presented with fatigue, mild dyspnea, and weight loss. A postero-anterior chest X-ray revealed a double aortic contour, absent on imaging two years prior, raising the suspicion of lymphadenopathy. This prompted a non-contrast CT that identified a 2 cm paraaortic lymph node metastasis. Surgical resection was successful, though the patient later died of unrelated causes. Recognition of a double aortic contour, created by an adjacent mass displacing mediastinal fat of differing attenuation, is crucial, yet detection is often hampered by variable pleural reflections and the small size or location of nodal disease. Comparative radiographs greatly enhance diagnostic confidence. However, given that fewer than half of aortopulmonary window lymphadenopathies are visible on X-ray and false negatives are common, CT confirmation remains essential when mediastinal lymphadenopathy is suspected.

Indexed as

adenopathyaortachest x-raydouble aortic contourmediastinum

Identifiers

PMID40519378
PMCPMC12166985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.