ArticleCureus2025
The Anterior Intermeniscal Ligament: A Comparative Study of Morphology in Male and Female Cadavers.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe anterior intermeniscal ligament (AIML) is a highly prevalent and functionally debated anatomical structure within the knee joint. While previous studies have suggested its potential role in meniscal stability, load distribution, and proprioception, detailed anatomical analyses are limited. This study aimed to assess the architectural characteristics of the AIML in male and female cadavers to elucidate potential sex-based differences. Methods: This observational study was based on 112 available cadaveric knee specimens, with a female-to-male ratio of 1:1, sourced from the anatomy labs of the Tilman J. Fertitta Family College of Medicine and Baylor College of Medicine. After blunt dissection, the AIML was exposed and measured using a Mitutoyo digital caliper 500-172-30 (Takatsu-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan). Various measurements of the AIML and surrounding soft tissue structures were performed, and the recorded averages were organized in Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington, United States). Statistical analysis was conducted utilizing GraphPad Prism 10.2.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, California, United States). Results: Statistical analyses revealed almost no significant differences in AIML dimensions other than greater medial AIML thickness in the right knee of male cadavers compared to female cadavers (right knee: t(110)=2.14; p=0.04). In the left knee, male cadavers demonstrated a trend toward increased medial AIML thickness, though this did not reach statistical significance (left knee: t(110)=-1.18; p=0.24). Additionally, male cadavers exhibited a trend toward larger mid-point AIML thickness bilaterally compared to female cadavers (right knee: t(110)=1.65 and p=0.10; left knee: t(110)=1.48 and p=0.14). These findings may suggest that sex-related factors influence AIML morphology, though further research with a larger sample size is necessary to determine statistical significance.
conclusionsThe absence of significant anatomical differences between sexes illuminates a potential contribution to sex-based disparities in knee pathology. Understanding AIML's structural properties may have implications for meniscal and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgeries, improving surgical precision and patient outcomes. Future studies could investigate other sex-related factors, such as q-angles or estrogen exposure, and their effect on AIML morphology. Additionally, other avenues of research could investigate and compare morphological measurements in younger and older populations to evaluate whether this structure is sensitive to osteoarthritic insults, better defining its functional role in knee joint stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.