Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40519357›Full record

ArticleBMJ medicine2025

Loneliness and all cause mortality in Australian women aged 45 years and older: causal inference analysis of longitudinal data.

Neta HaGani, Philip Clare, Dafna Merom, Ben J Smith, Ding Ding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Neta HaGaniPrevention Research Collaboration, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5442-1025
Philip ClarePrevention Research Collaboration, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Dafna MeromWestern Sydney University School of Science and Health, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.
Ben J SmithPrevention Research Collaboration, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Ding DingPrevention Research Collaboration, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9850-9224

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To examine the causal effects of loneliness on mortality among Australian women aged 45 years and older. Design: Causal inference analysis of longitudinal data. Participants: A population based sample of Australian women aged 45 years and older (n=11 412). Main outcome measures: Targeted maximum likelihood estimations were used to analyse the causal relationship between loneliness and all cause mortality over 18 years. The adjusted risk of death associated with the total number of loneliness waves (loneliness persistency) and the consecutive number of loneliness waves (loneliness chronicity) was presented using risk ratios and risk differences with 99.5% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: The association between the number of waves of reported loneliness and mortality risk showed a dose-dependent pattern. Compared with women who did not report loneliness in any wave, people who reported loneliness at two, four, and six waves had an incrementally higher risk of dying during the follow-up period: risk ratio 1.49 (99.5% CI 1.26 to 1.75) at two waves, 2.18 (1.79 to 2.66) at four waves, and 3.15 (2.35 to 4.23) at six waves. The risk difference showed a similar trend to the risk ratios with higher excess mortality among women who reported experiencing loneliness for six waves compared with those who did not report loneliness at all (10.86% (99.5% CI 10.58% to 11.15%)). Similar trends were found when loneliness was experienced across consecutive waves. Conclusions: Loneliness seems to be causally linked to mortality risk with a dose-dependent relationship. Acknowledging loneliness as an independent health risk underscores the importance of screening for loneliness and incorporating public health interventions into healthcare practices.

Indexed as

EpidemiologyPublic health

Identifiers

PMID40519357
PMCPMC12164320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.