ArticleBMJ medicine2025
Loneliness and all cause mortality in Australian women aged 45 years and older: causal inference analysis of longitudinal data.
Article in BMJ medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Have Australians become more lonely and socially isolated? A longitudinal analysis of the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia study.International journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- How Is One's Own and (Ex-)Partner's Professional Prestige Associated With Loneliness and Isolation? Findings Based on Cross-Sectional Data From Middle-Aged and Older Adults Living in Germany in 2022/2023.Health science reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To examine the causal effects of loneliness on mortality among Australian women aged 45 years and older. Design: Causal inference analysis of longitudinal data. Participants: A population based sample of Australian women aged 45 years and older (n=11 412). Main outcome measures: Targeted maximum likelihood estimations were used to analyse the causal relationship between loneliness and all cause mortality over 18 years. The adjusted risk of death associated with the total number of loneliness waves (loneliness persistency) and the consecutive number of loneliness waves (loneliness chronicity) was presented using risk ratios and risk differences with 99.5% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: The association between the number of waves of reported loneliness and mortality risk showed a dose-dependent pattern. Compared with women who did not report loneliness in any wave, people who reported loneliness at two, four, and six waves had an incrementally higher risk of dying during the follow-up period: risk ratio 1.49 (99.5% CI 1.26 to 1.75) at two waves, 2.18 (1.79 to 2.66) at four waves, and 3.15 (2.35 to 4.23) at six waves. The risk difference showed a similar trend to the risk ratios with higher excess mortality among women who reported experiencing loneliness for six waves compared with those who did not report loneliness at all (10.86% (99.5% CI 10.58% to 11.15%)). Similar trends were found when loneliness was experienced across consecutive waves. Conclusions: Loneliness seems to be causally linked to mortality risk with a dose-dependent relationship. Acknowledging loneliness as an independent health risk underscores the importance of screening for loneliness and incorporating public health interventions into healthcare practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.