Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40519355›Full record

ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2025

Automated classification of oral potentially malignant disorders and oral squamous cell carcinoma using a convolutional neural network framework: a cross-sectional study.

Cristina Saldivia-Siracusa, Eduardo Santos Carlos de Souza, Arnaldo Vitor Barros da Silva, Anna Luíza Damaceno Araújo, Caíque Mariano Pedroso, Tarcília Aparecida da Silva, Maria Sissa Pereira Sant'Ana, Felipe Paiva Fonseca, Hélder Antônio Rebelo Pontes, Marcos G Quiles and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Cristina Saldivia-SiracusaDepartamento de Diagnóstico Oral, Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Eduardo Santos Carlos de SouzaInstitute of Mathematics and Computer Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Arnaldo Vitor Barros da SilvaInstitute of Science and Technology, Federal University of São Paulo, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Anna Luíza Damaceno AraújoHead and Neck Surgery Department, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Caíque Mariano PedrosoDepartamento de Diagnóstico Oral, Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Tarcília Aparecida da SilvaDepartment of Oral Surgery and Pathology, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Maria Sissa Pereira Sant'AnaDepartment of Oral Surgery and Pathology, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Felipe Paiva FonsecaDepartment of Oral Surgery and Pathology, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Hélder Antônio Rebelo PontesService of Oral Pathology, João de Barros Barreto University Hospital, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Brazil.
Marcos G QuilesInstitute of Science and Technology, Federal University of São Paulo, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcio Ajudarte LopesDepartamento de Diagnóstico Oral, Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Pablo Agustin VargasDepartamento de Diagnóstico Oral, Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Syed Ali KhurramUnit of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Alexander T PearsonSection of Haematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Mark W LingenDepartment of Pathology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Luiz Paulo KowalskiHead and Neck Surgery Department, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Keith D HunterLiverpool Head and Neck Center, ISMIB, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
André Carlos Ponce de Leon Ferreira de CarvalhoInstitute of Mathematics and Computer Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Alan Roger Santos-SilvaDepartamento de Diagnóstico Oral, Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Artificial Intelligence (AI) models hold promise as useful tools in healthcare practice. We aimed to develop and assess AI models for automatic classification of oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMD) and oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) clinical images through a Deep Learning (DL) approach, and to explore explainability using Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM). Methods: This study assessed a dataset of 778 clinical images of OPMD and OSCC, divided into training, model optimization, and internal testing subsets with an 8:1:1 proportion. Transfer learning strategies were applied to pre-train 8 convolutional neural networks (CNN). Performance was evaluated by mean accuracy, precision, recall, specificity, F1-score and area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) values. Grad-CAM qualitative appraisal was performed to assess explainability. Findings: ConvNeXt and MobileNet CNNs showed the best performance. Transfer learning strategies enhanced performance for both algorithms, and the greatest model achieved mean accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score and AUROC of 0.799, 0.837, 0.756, 0.794 and 0.863 during internal testing, respectively. MobileNet displayed the lowest computational cost. Grad-CAM analysis demonstrated discrepancies between the best-performing model and the highest explainability model. Interpretation: ConvNeXt and MobileNet DL models accurately distinguished OSCC from OPMD in clinical photographs taken with different types of image-capture devices. Grad-CAM proved to be an outstanding tool to improve performance interpretation. Obtained results suggest that the adoption of DL models in healthcare could aid in diagnostic assistance and decision-making during clinical practice. Funding: This work was supported by FAPESP (2022/13069-8, 2022/07276-0, 2021/14585-7 and 2024/20694-1), CAPES, CNPq (307604/2023-3) and FAPEMIG.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceArtificial neural networkDeep learningHead and neck cancerOral cancerPrecancerous conditions

Identifiers

PMID40519355
PMCPMC12166441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.