ArticleAJO international2025
The effects of transitioning from SITA-Standard to SITA-Fast or SITA-Faster on sensitivities below the measurement floor.
Article in AJO international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Effective Dynamic Range and the Measurement Floor of SITA-Faster Visual Field Tests.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Article
- Volumetric Analysis of Perimetry Tests to Guide Central Testing: The Functional Vulnerability Zone.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Development and Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence Model to Set Target IOP for Glaucoma.American journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Determine how sensitivities below the measurement floor of the Humphrey Field Analyzer change when transitioning from Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) Standard to SITA-Fast and SITA-Faster strategies. Design: Retrospective descriptive study. Participants: A total of 21,468 24-2 SITA-Standard, 4872 SITA-Fast and 3468 SITA-Faster VFs from 7917 glaucoma and glaucoma suspect eyes with at least 5 VFs between 1997 and 2023 at the Wilmer Eye Institute. Methods: At each test location of the 24-2 test pattern, we measured the probability that <0 dB at a given test location on two baseline SITA-Standard VFs was M dB or higher on the first SITA-Fast or SITA-Faster post-baseline VF for different values of Main outcome measures: Probability of <0 dB at baseline being measured as Results: At Conclusions: Increased caution is advised when following the progression of <0 dB defects during a transition from SITA-Standard to SITA-Fast or SITA-Faster.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.