ArticleLe infezioni in medicina2025
Unmasking the Hidden Hurdles in Outpatient Parenteral Antibiotic Therapy using a lean six-sigma approach.
Article in Le infezioni in medicina, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- 2026 Updated good practice recommendations for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) in adults and children in the UK.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Review
- Utilizing Process Mapping as a Framework for Identifying and Prioritizing Barriers to Antibiotic Delivery in Resource-limited Settings.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Implementing Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT) safely poses significant challenges, particularly in centers without a dedicated OPAT team, where monitoring by infectious diseases (ID) physicians can be difficult. We utilized a Lean 6-Sigma framework to evaluate our OPAT process and define opportunities for improvement. Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, we screened 5 months of ID consult data for patients who left on OPAT from an urban hospital system. Primary outcome was incidence of adverse event (AE), a composite of either emergency department (ED) visit or all-cause 30-day readmission. Clinical characteristics and completeness of ID documentation were compared between patients with and without an AE. Complete documentation included antibiotic dose, duration, stop date, and a scheduled ID appointment. We simultaneously conducted a 6-sigma analysis involving stakeholders (physicians, case managers, nurses) in focus groups, to generate a process map, Ishikawa diagram, 5-Why's analysis, and identify heterogeneity in our OPAT process. Results: Fifty of 441 patients (11.3%) were discharged on OPAT and incidence AE was 30%. Neither type of infection, nor demographics, clinical characteristics, or discharge location differed between groups. Only half (50%) of the patients had complete documentation. Median time from discharge to clinic was 21 days, however, AE's occurred in a median time of 12 days. Patients without an AE were more likely to have been seen in the clinic post-discharge (51% versus 20%, p=0.039). ID clinic appointments were made for 60% of patients, with a show rate of 63%. Two additional unscheduled patients initiated their own visit. The 6-Sigma analysis identified process heterogeneity at discharge location and over-reliance on human memory for complete documentation. Interestingly, focus groups revealed numerous assumptions not supported by the objective data. Conclusions: Almost 1 in 3 patients leaving on OPAT experienced an adverse event. A 6 Sigma analysis identified heterogeneity in our process and incorrect assumptions among stakeholders. Next steps should focus on improving ID documentation and ensuring all patients leaving on OPAT have an ID clinic visit scheduled within 14 days after discharge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.