ArticleLe infezioni in medicina2025
Eat and heal. Past, present and future of maggot debridement therapy: a narrative review.
Article in Le infezioni in medicina, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- EvaluatingParasite epidemiology and control · 2026Article
- Neglected Trichilemmal Carcinoma with Severe Opportunistic Cutaneous Wound Myiasis: A First Case Report and Implications for Elderly Rural Populations.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In medicine, fly larvae play a dual role: they can be both harmful causative agents of diseases and therapeutic agents. In fact maggot debridement therapy (biosurgery) is the controlled use of larvae to treat infected wounds and dates back to the beginnings of medicine. Ambroise Paré and Dominique-Jean Larrey pioneered the field of biosurgery before the 19th century, but it was John Forney Zacharias during the American Civil War who officially documented and promoted this medical application. The success of this method was immediate. Nevertheless, germ theory and the postulates of Robert Koch discouraged physicians from using potentially contaminated material such as larvae from the second half of the 19th century onwards. In the first half of the 20th century, however, the practice regained momentum thanks to the sterilization of fly eggs and the success of Dr. Stanton K. Livingston in the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis with biotherapy. The use of larvae for therapeutic purposes was discontinued after the Second World War due to the discovery of penicillin and is now receiving some attention again due to the emergence of antibiotic- resistant bacteria. Although biosurgery is rarely encouraged, the results of systematic reviews and meta- analyzes support its use. Previous and current evidence shows that this practice may be as useful as ever in the age of antibiotic resistance. It is likely that larval therapy will be considered as a stand-alone tool in the near future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.