Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40519305›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer in a real-world setting: a population-based study.

Lina Cadili, Jonathan M Loree, Michael Peacock, Kimberly DeVries, Amandeep Ghuman, Ahmer A Karimuddin, P Terry Phang, Manoj J Raval, Carl J Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lina CadiliDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Jonathan M LoreeDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Michael PeacockDivision of Radiation Oncology and Developmental Therapeutics, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Kimberly DeVriesCancer Surveillance & Outcomes, Data & Analytics, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Amandeep GhumanDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Ahmer A KarimuddinDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
P Terry PhangDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Manoj J RavalDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Carl J BrownDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to determine the impact of time from neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) to surgery on the complete pathologic response (pCR) rate in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. NAT decreases the local recurrence of rectal cancer. Some patients achieve a pCR. The optimal time between NAT and surgery to maximize pCR remains uncertain. Method: We identified adults with T Results: In total, 3,476 patients were included from between 2000 and 2017. Of these, 1,554 (44.7%) received LCRT and 1,796 (51.7%) SCRT. The pCR rate was 13.2% (181/1373) among the LCRT group and 1.5% (26/1770) among the SCRT group. A pCR among the SCRT group was positively associated with weeks from SCRT to surgery [odds ratio (OR) 1.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13,1.86; p=0.003], tumor grade (grade 1 OR 5.72, 95% CI 1.70, 19.30, p=0.005), and stage (stage 1 OR 7.07, 95% CI 2.49, 20.08, p=<0.001). The pCR rate among the LCRT group was not associated with weeks from LCRT to surgery but was associated with sex and stage. Median follow-up was 9.5 years, and median overall survival (OS) was 9.7 years. Among patients receiving LCRT, the 5-year OS rate was higher (69.8%) when surgery followed LCRT by 6-10 weeks compared to those undergoing surgery <6 weeks or 10+ weeks post-LCRT ( Conclusion: Among rectal cancers treated with LCRT in a population-based cohort, longer delay to radical resection is associated with increased pCR rate. However, the overall pCR rate was lower than that reported in trial populations.

Indexed as

colorectal cancerlocally advanced rectal cancerneoadjuvant therapyoncologypathologic complete response (pCR)rectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID40519305
PMCPMC12162324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.