Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40519299›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Case Report: Endoscopic submucosal tunneling dissection using a golden knife for a giant gastric cancer lesion: a case report and literature review.

Pan Wu, Xi-Feng Jin

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pan WuNursing Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Xi-Feng JinDepartments of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) is a well-established technique for the removal of early gastrointestinal cancers. However, it is often perceived as time-consuming and carries a higher risk, particularly when dealing with larger lesions, especially those exceeding 3 cm in diameter. In this case report, we introduce the application of Endoscopic Submucosal Tunneling Dissection (ESTD) for the management of a substantial gastric superficial neoplasia, which encompassed a considerable area of early gastric cancer. Although there are several case reports detailing the use of ESTD for the resection of gastrointestinal cancers, there have been no documented instances of utilizing a "Golden Knife" specifically for the treatment of large gastric cancer lesions. Case presentation: This case report details the treatment of a 64-year-old male diagnosed with a large early-stage gastric cancer, measuring approximately 140 mm by 88 mm. The medical team opted for endoscopic submucosal tunneling dissection (ESTD) using a golden knife, a technique chosen for its effectiveness in managing such tumors. Following the procedure, pathological examination indicated a pT1a tumor of the tub2 type, with dimensions of 120 mm by 42 mm. Importantly, all assessments, including ulcer (UL), lymphatic (LY, vascular (V), histological margin (HM), and vascular margin (VM), returned negative results, suggesting no further spread of the cancer. However, post-surgery, the patient experienced gastric stenosis, necessitating additional interventions, which included the placement of a nutritional tube and dilation of the stenosis to alleviate symptoms. The intraoperative strategies employed during the ESTD procedure, along with coordinated care and psychological support throughout the recovery process, played a crucial role in helping the patient regain confidence. This comprehensive approach ultimately contributed to satisfactory outcomes in his recovery journey. Conclusion: In conclusion, ESTD offers a safer and more effective alternative to traditional methods in specific cases, especially for patients with large or challenging gastric lesions who favor a minimally invasive approach.

Indexed as

ESDESTDgastric cancergiant gastric cancer lesiongolden knife

Identifiers

PMID40519299
PMCPMC12162326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.