ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II early onset colorectal cancer: exploration and discovery using real-world data and the SEER database.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06308354 (Colorectal Cancer Dataset in Xijing Hospital From 2011), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Colorectal Cancer Dataset in Xijing Hospital From 2011
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim: The incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) is rising, yet intensive postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) often results in overtreatment with minimal prognostic benefit. This study aims to assess the therapeutic necessity of ACT in stage II EOCRC patients and to identify potential ACT candidates. Methods: A total of 296 non-ACT and 50 ACT patients with stage II EOCRC were included from Xijing Hospital (XJCRC), and 2067 non-ACT and 1163 ACT patients were enrolled from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cohort. To address selection bias and confounding, propensity score matching, inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW), and multivariate Cox regression analyses were utilized. Survival curves and landmark analysis were employed to compare Overall Survival (OS) differences. Results: Similar OS were observed between ACT and non-ACT groups in both cohorts before and after adjustment for confounders. No significant survival differences were noted in dMMR (P = 0.48), pMMR (P = 0.07), and T3 (P = 0.83) subgroups. However, T4 stage patients receiving ACT demonstrated prolonged survival compared to non-ACT counterparts, particularly after three years (P = 0.007), as identified by landmark analysis. Conclusions: Most stage II EOCRC patients might yield limited benefits from postoperative ACT, with the sole exception of those at T4 stage, who could experience long-term clinical advantages. Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/, identifier NCT06308354.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.