ArticleTrauma case reports2025
Robotic assisted splenectomy after failure of splenic angioembolization in blunt abdominal trauma.
Article in Trauma case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traumatic blunt splenic injury in the hemodynamically stable patient is initially managed with a nonoperative strategy that may include angioembolization. If patients continue to have ongoing signs of bleeding after angioembolization, definitive management is surgical splenectomy. We report the case of a patient with a grade IV blunt splenic injury who had ongoing bleeding after angioembolization and was taken for diagnostic robotic surgery. An isolated splenic injury was identified and the patient was treated with robotic splenectomy. On one month follow up the patient was noted to be doing well with minimal pain. To our knowledge, this is the first report of robotic splenectomy after failed non-operative manage in the setting of trauma. This case shows the potential value of robotic surgery to apply the benefits of minimally invasive surgery in hemodynamically stable patients who fail non-operative management after traumatic splenic injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.