Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40519272›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2025

NK cell activity in the tumor microenvironment.

A V Kuznetsova, X A Glukhova, I P Beletsky, A A Ivanov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A V KuznetsovaLaboratory of Molecular and Cellular Pathology, Russian University of Medicine, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
X A GlukhovaOnni Biotechnologies Ltd., Helsinki, Finland.
I P BeletskyOnni Biotechnologies Ltd., Helsinki, Finland.
A A IvanovLaboratory of Molecular and Cellular Pathology, Russian University of Medicine, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The formation of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) impairs natural killer (NK) cell infiltration and persistence within tumor tissue and significantly diminishes NK-mediated cytotoxicity. This presents a substantial barrier to the efficacy of NK cell therapy in solid tumors. Current strategies aim to overcome immune evasion by enhancing NK cell recognition and cytotoxicity, while promoting their persistence, infiltration, and resistance to the TME. This review focusses on the biophysical characteristics of TME and specific components of the extracellular matrix (ECM) that affect NK cell activity, with the goal of identifying therapeutic approaches to modulate the TME and create a supportive niche for adaptive immune cell function. Advancements in interdisciplinary collaborations integrating oncology, cell biology, physics, engineering, materials science, and nanotechnology are crucial in advancing therapeutic strategies targeting ECM rigidity and mechanotransduction signaling pathways.

Indexed as

anti-NK cell signalingextracellular matrixhuman natural killer cellsnew targetstumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID40519272
PMCPMC12162653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.