Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40519194›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2025

Evaluation of Blood Pressure Control, Medication Adherence, and Therapeutic Inertia in US Patients With Hypertension Prescribed Multiple Antihypertensives.

Jeff T Mohl, Carlos A Moreno, Kay Sadik, Mukul Singhal, Alicia Rooney, Elizabeth L Ciemins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Hypertension control within the HEARTS program of south-west Trinidad: a longitudinal mixed-effects analysis.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2026
    Article
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jeff T MohlAMGA (American Medical Group Association) Alexandria VA USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7415-9223
Carlos A MorenoAMGA (American Medical Group Association) Alexandria VA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1237-0645
Kay SadikJanssen Scientific Affairs, LLC Titusville NJ USA.
Mukul SinghalJanssen Scientific Affairs, LLC Titusville NJ USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6986-6887
Alicia RooneyAMGA (American Medical Group Association) Alexandria VA USA.ORCID 0009-0005-2731-4944
Elizabeth L CieminsAMGA (American Medical Group Association) Alexandria VA USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1262-7946

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFailure to control blood pressure (BP) despite multiple prescribed antihypertensive medications (AHMs) is widespread and leads to worse clinical outcomes. Recent changes to BP targets in US clinical guidelines require an updated evaluation of BP control including evaluations of nonadherence and therapeutic inertia.

methodsWe leveraged clinical and insurance data sourced from >50 US health care organizations to identify >500 000 patients with established hypertension (>15-month history) concurrently prescribed ≥3 AHM classes in 2019. We characterized the prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension and describe patterns of nonadherence (lack of AHM fills covering >80% of days) and therapeutic inertia (failure to escalate AHM for patients persistently out of BP control). We described the associations with factors including race, ethnicity, sex, and insurance.

resultsAmong 565 737 patients prescribed ≥3 AHMs, 37.7% met the recommended BP target of <130/80 mm Hg. Black race (odds ratio [OR], 0.71 [95% CI, 0.70-0.73]) and uninsured status (OR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.76-0.86]) were most associated with lack of BP control relative to White or commercially insured patients. In a subset of insured patients, nonadherence occurred in 52.7%, although BP control remained poor among adherent patients (43.0% versus 39.4% for nonadherent). Therapeutic inertia was widespread; 64.5% of patients persistently above the BP target had no medication escalation within 18 months.

conclusionsAn evaluation of a US-based, large, real-world patient cohort demonstrates that most patients prescribed ≥3 AHMs fail to achieve the recommended BP target of <130/80, and both medication nonadherence and therapeutic inertia are widespread.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureHypertensionMedication AdherenceAgedDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesAntihypertensive Agentsantihypertensive medicationhypertensioninertianonadherence

Identifiers

PMID40519194
PMCPMC12229206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.