Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40519108›Full record

ArticleAnnals of neurology2025

Visual Features in Stereo-Electroencephalography to Predict Surgical Outcome: A Multicenter Study.

Chifaou Abdallah, John Thomas, Olivier Aron, Tamir Avigdor, Kassem Jaber, Irena Doležalová, Daniel Mansilla, Päivi Nevalainen, Prachi Parikh, Jaysingh Singh and 11 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Chifaou AbdallahMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7232-6673
John ThomasDepartment of Neurology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Olivier AronDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital of Nancy, Lorraine University, Nancy, France.
Tamir AvigdorMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1283-7978
Kassem JaberDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke Pratt School of Engineering, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Irena DoležalováBrno Epilepsy Center, First Department of Neurology, St. Anne's University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Daniel MansillaMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Päivi NevalainenEpilepsia Helsinki, Full member of ERN EpiCare, Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, HUS Diagnostic Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-1300-2323
Prachi ParikhDepartment of Neurology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Jaysingh SinghDepartment of Neurology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Sandor BeniczkyDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6035-6581
Philippe KahaneCHU Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Grenoble, France.
Lorella MinottiCHU Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Grenoble, France.
Stephan ChabardesCHU Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7930-1476
Sophie Colnat-CoulboisDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital of Nancy, Lorraine University, Nancy, France.
Louis MaillardDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital of Nancy, Lorraine University, Nancy, France.
Jeff HallMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Francois DubeauMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Jean GotmanMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Christophe GrovaMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Birgit FrauscherMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Funding

CIHR CIHR, PJT-175056CIHR Doctoral AwardCIHR //doi.org/10.69777/320890Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé Doctoral AwardFonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé Salary AwardSavoy Foundation Doctoral Award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEpilepsy surgery needs predictive features that are easily implemented in clinical practice. Previous studies are limited by small sample sizes, lack of external validation, and complex computational approaches. We aimed to identify and validate visually stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) features with the highest predictive value for surgical outcome, and assess the reliability of their visual extraction.

methodsWe included 177 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent SEEG-guided surgery at 4 epilepsy centers. We assessed the predictive performance of 10 SEEG features from various SEEG periods for surgical outcome, using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and considering resected channels and surgical outcome as the gold standard. Findings were validated externally using balanced accuracy. Six experts, blinded to outcome, evaluated the visual reliability of the optimal feature using interrater reliability, percentage agreement (standard deviation ± SD) and Gwet's kappa (κ ± SD).

resultsThe derivation cohort comprised 100 consecutive patients, each with at least 1-year of postoperative follow up (40% temporal lobe epilepsy; 42% Engel Ia). Spatial co-occurrence of gamma spikes and preictal spikes emerged as the optimal predictive feature of surgical outcome (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.82). Applying the optimized threshold from the derivation cohort, external validation in 2 datasets showed similar performances (balanced accuracy 69.2% and 73.2%). Expert interrater reliability for gamma spikes (percentage agreement, 96% ± 2%; κ, 0.63 ± 0.16) and preictal spikes (percentage agreement, 92% ± 2%; κ, 0.65 ± 0.18) were substantial.

interpretationSpatial co-occurrence of gamma spikes and preictal spikes predicts surgical outcome. These visually identifiable features may reduce the burden of SEEG analysis by reducing analysis time, and improve outcome by guiding surgical resection margins. ANN NEUROL 2025;98:547-560.

Indexed as

Drug Resistant EpilepsyElectroencephalographyAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsStereotaxic TechniquesTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40519108
PMCPMC12392059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.