Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40519072›Full record

ReviewAdvanced healthcare materials2025

Integration of Bioengineered Tools in Assisted Reproductive Technologies.

Aslı Ak, Edith Coonen, Ron van Golde, Erik Vrij

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced healthcare materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Endometrial immune dysregulation shapes CD8Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aslı AkDepartment of Cell Biology-Inspired Tissue Engineering (cBITE), MERLN Institue for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, 6229 ET, The Netherlands.
Edith CoonenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, 6229 ET, The Netherlands.
Ron van GoldeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, 6229 ET, The Netherlands.
Erik VrijDepartment of Cell Biology-Inspired Tissue Engineering (cBITE), MERLN Institue for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, 6229 ET, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0702-5609

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infertility affects ≈17.5% of the adult population worldwide, posing significant clinical, emotional, and socioeconomic challenges. Recent advances at the intersection of reproductive medicine and bioengineering offer promising avenues to enhance assisted reproductive technologies (ART). This review synthesizes emerging microengineered and stem cell-based platforms designed to improve key ART stages from gamete handling and fertilization to embryo culture and implantation. State-of-the-art microfluidic systems that refine sperm selection by leveraging directional behavioral responses, enhancing motility, and preserving DNA integrity is discussed. Moreover, devices for oocyte denudation and cryopreservation have been developed to mitigate cellular stress associated with conventional processing techniques. While microengineered platforms demonstrate promise in sperm sorting and reducing stress on gametes, their broader application in ART, particularly for oocyte handling and embryo culture, requires further development. The review further addresses stem cell-based embryo models and bioengineered endometrial platforms, which aim to recapitulate the dynamic in vivo microenvironments needed for successful fertilization, embryo development, and implantation. Despite encouraging preliminary results, challenges such as scalability, reproducibility, clinical validation, and ethical considerations remain. By identifying these gaps and proposing future directions, this review considers integrating microengineering and bioengineering approaches to streamline ART procedures, ultimately enabling more personalized and effective reproductive therapies.

Indexed as

BioengineeringReproductive Techniques, AssistedAnimalsFemaleHumansMaleOocytesassisted reproductive technologiesbioengineered platformsfertilizationimplantationin vitro modelsstem cell‐based embryo models

Identifiers

PMID40519072
PMCPMC12365630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.