ReviewComprehensive reviews in food science and food safety2025
Traditional and Emerging Physical Processing Technologies: Applications and Challenges in Allergen Control of Animal and Plant Proteins.
Review in Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Allergenicity Assessment of Precision Fermentation-Derived Food Proteins.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Physical Processing of Aquatic Gel Foods: From Protein Structure Regulation to Health, Sustainability, and Personalized Design.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Review
- Recent Advances in Food Allergens and Emerging Biosensing Technologies.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Review
- Advances in Food Processing Techniques for Allergenicity Reduction and Allergen Identification.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Traditional and Emerging Physical Processing Technologies: Applications and Challenges in Allergen Control of Animal and Plant Proteins.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Under global food shortages and environmental challenges, the food industry is shifting from animal to plant proteins, coinciding with a rising prevalence of food allergies. Structural and functional differences between animal and plant proteins significantly influence their allergenic potential. Traditional and emerging physical processing technologies can modify protein structures and reduce immunoreactivity without chemical additives, preserving food quality. These technologies are categorized into thermal, radiation, light, high-pressure, transient pressure, mechanical wave, plasma, and electric field effects. Cold plasma is particularly effective in modifying protein structures by generating reactive species. High hydrostatic pressure also demonstrates significant potential, particularly when combined with heat treatment. Ultrasound, especially when integrated with other methods (e.g., enzymatic hydrolysis or glycosylation), offers versatile and cost-effective solutions. Microwave heating remains a practical option due to its efficiency and scalability, while gamma irradiation remains an effective tool for allergen reduction despite its regulatory and consumer acceptance challenges. Low-allergenic processed foods can induce oral tolerance in allergic individuals, necessitating comprehensive safety evaluations covering allergenicity, toxicity, and nutrition. Unintentional allergens in food processing pose risks, and current regulations are insufficient. International organizations have proposed precautionary allergen labeling to protect consumers. While processing technologies cannot fully eliminate allergenicity, optimized selection can mitigate risks. Future research should focus on their impact on functional properties, nutritional value, safety, cost, and production efficiency to ensure safe and effective application in the food industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.