Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40518970›Full record

ArticleAge and ageing2025

Using scores from the 4AT delirium detection tool as an indicator of possible dementia: a study of 75 221 older adult hospital admissions.

Rose S Penfold, Emily Bowman, Emma R L C Vardy, Elizabeth L Sampson, Atul Anand, Bruce Guthrie, Alasdair M J MacLullich

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Age and ageing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rose S PenfoldUsher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, NINE 9 Little France Road Edinburgh BioQuarter City, Edinburgh EH16 4UX, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7023-7108
Emily BowmanDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Emma R L C VardyRoyal Oldham Hospital, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Rochdale Road, Oldham, OL1 2JH & Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Elizabeth L SampsonAcademic Centre for Healthy Ageing-Barts Health NHS Trust, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Atul AnandCentre for Cardiovascular Science, The University of Edinburgh College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, Rooms SU.305, Chancellor's Building 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6428-4554
Bruce GuthrieAdvanced Care Research Centre, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4191-4880
Alasdair M J MacLullichAgeing and Health, The University of Edinburgh Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3159-9370

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOverall dementia diagnosis rates are substantially below true rates. Hospital admissions of older people involve cognitive and functional assessments relevant to dementia diagnosis. These assessments could be harnessed to contribute to identifying patients for further assessment. Yet relationships of inpatient cognitive tests with known dementia are unclear. The 4AT (www.the4AT.com) assesses for delirium (Scores 4-12) and also cognitive impairment via embedded cognitive tests (Scores 1-3). We investigated relationships between 4AT scores and clinical dementia diagnoses.

methodsWe included participants aged ≥65 years admitted as a medical emergency to three hospitals from 4 January 2016 to 4 January 2020, who had the 4AT performed on admission. Clinical dementia diagnosis was ascertained from linked primary care, hospital discharge and community prescribing data.

resultsOf 75 221 admissions, 62 188 (82.7%; 33 625 unique patients; mean age 80.2 years; 55.8% female) had a 4AT on admission. Of these, 9948 (16.0%) had a recorded clinical dementia diagnosis at the time of admission, with a further 1197 (1.9%) receiving a new diagnosis at discharge. Of admissions with dementia, 9669/11 145 (86.8%) had a 4AT score ≥1 on admission, compared to 14 994/51 043 (29.4%) without dementia.4AT ≥1 had a sensitivity of 0.87 (95% CI 0.86-0.87) and a specificity of 0.71 (0.70-0.71) in relation to clinical dementia diagnosis. 4AT ≥4 showed sensitivity of 0.50 (0.50-0.51) and a specificity of 0.88 (0.88-0.88).

conclusions4AT scores were associated with clinically diagnosed dementia. These results suggest that routinely collected 4AT scores could be leveraged in conjunction with other clinical indicators to identify patients with possible undiagnosed dementia who could undergo further inpatient diagnostic assessment and/or post-discharge specialist follow-up.

Indexed as

DeliriumDementiaGeriatric AssessmentMental Status and Dementia TestsNeuropsychological TestsPatient AdmissionAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHospitalizationHumansMalePredictive Value of Testsacute careassessmentdeliriumdementiahospitalolder people

Identifiers

PMID40518970
PMCPMC12167849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.