ArticleJournal of Parkinson's disease2025
Twenty-five-year experience with apomorphine pump in Parkinson's disease: A real-life long-term retrospective tolerance study.
Article in Journal of Parkinson's disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-world neuropsychiatric safety profile of foslevodopa/foscarbidopa infusion in advanced Parkinson's disease.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Therapeutic Spectrum of Intermittent Apomorphine in Parkinson's Disease: Neuropsychiatric, Behavioral, and Cognitive Analyses.Noro psikiyatri arsivi · 2026Article
- Nationwide analysis of real-world access to and use of device-aided therapies in Parkinson's disease: insights from the French National Healthcare Data System (2015-2021).BMJ neurology open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundContinuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion (CSAI) is a standard of care treatment in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) to treat motor fluctuations. However, literature about its long-term data is scarce.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to report about CSAI tolerance and discontinuation predictors in a large monocentric cohort.MethodsConsecutive PD patients who had CSAI were included. CSAI duration, discontinuation rates at 3, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months, demographic data, MDS-UPDRS motor score, adverse events (AEs), discontinuation reasons and predictive factors were analyzed with logistic regression.ResultsA total of 208 patients were included from 1999 to 2023 (51% male; age: 67.4 ± 8.3 years; PD duration: 11.2 ± 5.0 years). In the overall group, CSAI duration was 25.0 ± 32.9 months (median: 13.0, range: 0.1-260.0). Ninety-five patients (45.7%) discontinued CSAI after 12.7 ± 15.3 months (median: 8.0). Main discontinuation causes were switching to deep brain stimulation (44.2%) and low efficacy (15.8%). Sixty% of discontinuations occurred within the first year. CSAI duration was the only significant difference between ongoing CSAI (116) and discontinued patients (35.4 ± 39.7 vs. 11.1 ± 18.4 months;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.